%% You should probably cite draft-dhody-pce-pcep-p2mp-per-destination-12 instead of this revision.
@techreport{dhody-pce-pcep-p2mp-per-destination-03,
    number =    {draft-dhody-pce-pcep-p2mp-per-destination-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-p2mp-per-destination/03/},
    author =    {Dhruv Dhody and Udayasree Palle and Venugopal Reddy Kondreddy},
    title =     {{Supporting explicit inclusion or exclusion of abstract nodes for a subset of P2MP destinations in Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP).}},
    pagetotal = 12,
    year =      2012,
    month =     oct,
    day =       11,
    abstract =  {The ability to determine paths of point-to-multipoint (P2MP) Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) is one the key requirements for Path Computation Element (PCE). {[}RFC6006{]} and {[}PCE-P2MP-PROCEDURES{]} describes these mechanisms for intra and inter domain path computation via PCE. This document describes the need for explicitly specifying abstract nodes for inclusion or exclusion for a subset of destinations during the Point to Multipoint (P2MP) path computation via PCE. Further an extension to the PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) for P2MP is suggested to support this.},
}