Updating References to the IETF FTP Service
draft-danyliw-replace-ftp-pointers-06

Yes

John Scudder
Murray Kucherawy
Éric Vyncke
(Alvaro Retana)
(Lars Eggert)
(Martin Duke)
(Martin Vigoureux)

No Objection

Erik Kline
Francesca Palombini
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
(Benjamin Kaduk)
(Robert Wilton)

Recuse

Roman Danyliw

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

John Scudder
Yes
Comment (2021-10-05 for -04) Sent 
Nit, s/can be access/can be accessed/
Murray Kucherawy
Yes
Éric Vyncke
Yes
Erik Kline
No Objection
Comment (2021-09-30 for -03) Sent 
[S3.11, nit]

* "March 002" -> "March 2002"

[S3.16, nit]

* Stray space still in the replacement URI?
Francesca Palombini
No Objection
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Comment (2021-10-05 for -04) Not sent 
Thanks for the work put into this document.
Roman Danyliw
Recuse
Comment (2021-10-04 for -03) Not sent 
Recusing as I am the author.  

Éric Vyncke: thank you for AD sponsoring this document.
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -04) Not sent 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Lars Eggert Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            Yes
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                Yes 
                                
                                    (for -03)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Martin Duke Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            Yes
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                Yes 
                                
                                    (2021-10-05 for -04)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
(3.1) I would recommend https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/ as a shorter and more memorable URL than /in-notes, but obviously it's no big deal.

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            Yes
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                Yes 
                                
                                    (for -04)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
        
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2021-10-06 for -04)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
Section 3.4

   The MIB in Section 3 of [RFC2954] is updated as follows:

Can we really update a MIB without changing its LAST-UPDATED stanza?
(Likewise for the other similar MIB updates.)
Maybe we should just say we update the text and not say anything about
the fact that it appears in a MIB...

Section 3.11

   OLD:

   [9] Ogier, R., Message in IETF email archive for MANET,
   ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/manet/2002-03.mail, March 2002.

   NEW:

   [9] Ogier, R., Message in IETF email archive for MANET,
   https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/ietf-mail-archive/manet/2002-02.mail,
   March 2002.

Looks like a copy/paste issue about 2002-03 vs 2002-02.

RFC 5428

   The MIB in Section 5 of [RFC5428] is updated as follows:

I think the MIB is in Section 6, not 5.

NITS

Section 3.12

   OLD:

   [LEACH] Leach, P., email to IETF Kerberos working group mailing list,
   5 May 2003, ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail- archive/krb-
   wg/2003-05.mail.

The formatting and line break don't seem to have been preserved from the
original.

Section 3.16

   OLD:

   [DAI] Dai, W., "An attack against SSH2 protocol", Email to the SECSH
   Working Group ietf-ssh@netbsd.org ftp:// ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-
   archive/secsh/2002- 02.mail, Feb 2002.

(ditto)

Section 4

   more secure way.  For example, HTTPS provides an encrypted channel
   that includes protections such as verifying the server's identity per
   the certificate verification behavior of the client, and integrity
   and confidentiality commensurate with the negotiated TLS protocol
   version and ciphersuite.

s/commensurate/protection commensurate/

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Robert Wilton Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2021-10-01 for -03)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
Roman, thanks for doing this.