@techreport{cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-02,
    number =    {draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cmfg-pce-pcep-grammar/02/},
    author =    {Ramon Casellas and Cyril Margaria and Adrian Farrel and Oscar Gonzalez de Dios and Dhruv Dhody and Xian Zhang},
    title =     {{Current issues with existing RBNF notation for PCEP messages and extensions}},
    pagetotal = 18,
    year =      2014,
    month =     jan,
    day =       10,
    abstract =  {The PCEP protocol has been defined in {[}RFC5440{]} and later extended in several RFCs. This document aims at documenting inconsistencies when implementing a set of extensions and at providing a reference, complete and formal RBNF grammar for PCEP messages, including object ordering and precedence rules.},
}