Service Assurance for Intent-based Networking Architecture
draft-claise-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03

• Status
• IESG evaluation record
• IESG writeups
• Email expansions
• History

• Versions
• 00
• 01
• 02
• 03

OPSAWG                                                         B. Claise
Internet-Draft                                               J. Quilbeuf
Intended status: Informational                       Cisco Systems, Inc.
Expires: January 28, 2021                                    Y. El Fathi
                                                Orange Business Services
                                                                D. Lopez
                                                          Telefonica I+D
                                                                D. Voyer
                                                             Bell Canada
                                                           July 27, 2020

       Service Assurance for Intent-based Networking Architecture
         draft-claise-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03

Abstract

   This document describes an architecture for Service Assurance for
   Intent-based Networking (SAIN).  This architecture aims at assuring
   that service instances are correctly running.  As services rely on
   multiple sub-services by the underlying network devices, getting the
   assurance of a healthy service is only possible with a holistic view
   of network devices.  This architecture not only helps to correlate
   the service degradation with the network root cause but also the
   impacted services when a network component fails or degrades.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on January 28, 2021.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

Claise, et al.          Expires January 28, 2021                [Page 1]
Internet-DraService Assurance for Intent-based Networking Arc  July 2020

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.  Architecture  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.1.  Decomposing a Service Instance Configuration into an
           Assurance Graph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     3.2.  Intent and Assurance Graph  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     3.3.  Subservices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     3.4.  Building the Expression Graph from the Assurance Graph  .  11
     3.5.  Building the Expression from a Subservice . . . . . . . .  12
     3.6.  Open Interfaces with YANG Modules . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
     3.7.  Handling Maintenance Windows  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     3.8.  Flexible Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
     3.9.  Timing  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
     3.10. New Assurance Graph Generation  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
   6.  Open Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
   7.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     7.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     7.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
   Appendix A.  Changes between revisions  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19

1.  Terminology

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.