IS-IS Multi Topology Deployment Considerations
draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-mt-deployment-cons-04
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Uma Chunduri , Jeff Tantsura , Shraddha Hegde | ||
| Last updated | 2021-05-28 (latest revision 2020-11-24) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-mt-deployment-cons-04.txt
Abstract
This document analyzes IS-IS Multi Topology (MT) applicability in various IS-IS deployments. This document explores the nuances around the terminology and usage of various IS-IS address families, topologies with different considerations, for choosing the right combination for a specific deployment scenario. This document also discusses various ways one can deploy IPv6 only IS-IS topology.
Authors
Uma Chunduri
(umac.ietf@gmail.com)
Jeff Tantsura
(jefftant.ietf@gmail.com)
Shraddha Hegde
(shraddha@juniper.net)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)