ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703, and MC12.22 Transport Over IP
draft-c1222-transport-over-ip-08
The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 6142.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Avygdor Moise , Jonathan Brodkin | ||
| Last updated | 2018-12-20 (Latest revision 2011-01-10) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Informational | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews | |||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 6142 (Informational) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Ralph Droms | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-c1222-transport-over-ip-08
Network Working Group A. Moise
Internet-Draft J. Brodkin
Intended status: Informational Future DOS R&D Inc.
Expires: July 14, 2011 January 10, 2011
ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703 and MC12.22 Transport Over IP
draft-c1222-transport-over-ip-08
Abstract
This RFC provides a framework for transporting ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/
MC12.22 Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Application-Layer
Messages on an IP network.
This document is not an official submission on behalf of the ANSI
C12.19 and C12.22 working groups. It was created by participants in
those groups building on knowledge of several proprietary C12.22 over
IP implementations. The content of this document is an expression of
a consensus aggregation of those implementations.
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 14, 2011.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. The C12.22 IP Network Segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.1. Composition of a C12.22 IP Network Segment . . . . . . . . 7
4.2. Native IP Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.3. Encoding of Native IP Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.4. Standardized Port Numbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.5. Use of UDP Source Port 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.6. IP Multicast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.7. IP Broadcast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.8. Encoding of Multicast and Broadcast Addresses . . . . . . 13
5. IP Message Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.1. C12.22 Connection Types and TCP/UDP Transport Modes . . . 15
5.2. IP Message Transport Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5.2.1. TCP and UDP Port Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5.2.2. Active-OPEN UDP (CL=1, CL Accept=0) . . . . . . . . . 17
5.2.3. Passive-OPEN UDP (CL=1, CL Accept=1) . . . . . . . . . 17
5.2.4. Active-OPEN TCP Mode (CO=1, CO Accept=0) . . . . . . . 18
5.2.5. Passive-OPEN TCP Mode (CO=1, CO Accept=1) . . . . . . 18
5.2.6. TCP and C12.22 Message Directionality . . . . . . . . 19
5.3. Using IP Broadcast/Multicast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
5.4. Transport Protocol Decisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.4.1. Unicast Versus Multicast Versus Broadcast . . . . . . 20
5.4.2. Sending Large C12.22 APDUs Using UDP . . . . . . . . . 20
5.4.3. Choice of Protocol for C12.22 Response APDUs . . . . . 21
5.5. Quality of Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
5.6. Congestion Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
8. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
1. Introduction
The ANSI C12.22 standard [1] provides a set of application layer
messaging services that are applicable for the enterprise and End
Device components of an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) for
the Smart Grid. The messaging services are tailored for, but not
limited to, the exchange of the data Tables Elements defined and co-
published in ANSI C12.19 [2], IEEE P1377 [3], and MC12.19 [4]. These
standards were developed jointly by ANSI (ANSI C12.22 and ANSI
C12.19), by IEEE (IEEE 1377 and IEEE 1703) and Measurement Canada
(MC12.19 and MC12.22).
ANSI C12.22, which is an application-level messaging protocol, may be
transported over any underlying transport network. This RFC defines
the requirements governing the transmission of ANSI C12.22 Messages
via the TCP and UDP transports in IP networks (whereby the OSI
Session, Presentation, and Application Layers of ANSI C12.22 are
collapsed into a single Application Layer).
Specifically, this RFC applies to the operational details of Section
5, C12.22 Node to C12.22 Network Segment Details, of ANSI C12.22, and
covers the mapping, encoding, and interpreting of ANSI C12.19 Device
Network Table Elements and Native Addresses for use on IP networks.
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [5].
Throughout this document we use terms like ANSI C12.22 or ANSI
C12.19, as in C12.22 Relay or ANSI C12.19 Device. These terms are
interchangeable with the terms IEEE 1703 Relay and IEEE 1377 Device,
respectively. However, the recent versions of the Utility End Device
communication standards were developed under the auspices of ANSI C12
SC17 WG1 and ANSI C12 SC17 WG2. For that reason, the terminology
used in this document expands on the ANSI C12.22-2008 [1] and ANSI
C12.19-2008 [2] definitions as revised by IEEE 1703-2009 [6] and IEEE
1377-2010 [3].
3. Definitions
This specification uses a number of terms to refer to the roles
played by participants (actors) in, and objects of, the ANSI C12.22
[1], IEEE 1703 [6], and MC12.22 [7] protocol. Terms prefixed by
C12.22 or C12.19, which are not defined here, can be resolved in [1],
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
[6], [7] or [2], [3], [4].
ACSE
Association Control Service Element. In the context of this
specification and of [1], ACSEs are encoded per ISO/IEC 10035-1
[8] using the ASN.1 BER [9].
Active-OPEN UDP
Active-OPEN UDP is a state used by a local C12.22 IP Node to
expect and receive incoming C12.22 Messages that it solicited from
a foreign C12.22 IP Node using the UDP. The local C12.22 IP Node
MAY exit the Active-OPEN UDP state when it has received all of the
expected C12.22 Messages or a C12.22 Message timeout has occurred.
The local C12.22 IP Node receives all C12.22 Response Messages
solicited from the foreign C12.22 IP Node that arrive at the local
port number that matches the source port number used to solicit
the C12.22 Messages from the foreign C12.22 IP Node.
Active-OPEN TCP
Active-OPEN TCP is a state used by a local C12.22 IP Node to
establish a TCP connection with a fully-specified foreign C12.22
IP Node using TCP and the foreign C12.22 IP Node's registered
Native IP Address. The Active-OPEN TCP state is identical to
"local active OPEN" defined in [11].
APDU
Application Protocol Data Unit. In the context of the ANSI C12.22
Application, it is an ACSE C12.22 Message.
ACSE APDU
ACSE Application Protocol Data Unit; same as APDU.
ApTitle
An ANSI C12.22 Application-process Title. An ApTitle is a name
for a system-independent application activity that exposes
application services to the application agent; e.g., a set of
application service elements that together perform all or part of
the communication aspects of an application process. An ApTitle
is encoded as a unique registered (as per [1]) object identifier.
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
C12.22 IP Node
A C12.22 Node that is located on a C12.22 IP Network Segment and
communicates using the IP protocol.
C12.22 IP Network Segment
A collection of all C12.22 IP Nodes that implement the IP-based
protocols, as defined in this specification, and can communicate
with each other using IP routers, switches, and bridges and
without the use of a C12.22 Relay.
C12.22 IP Relay
A C12.22 IP Node that performs the functions of a C12.22 Relay.
A C12.22 IP Relay acts as a bridge between a C12.22 IP Network
Segment and an adjacent, C12.22 Network Segment.
C12.22 Message
An ACSE APDU that is also a fully assembled or a segment of a
C12.22 Request Message or a C12.22 Response Message. The C12.22
Message described in this specification MUST be encoded using [9].
C12.22 Request Message
A fully assembled C12.22 APDU that contains an ACSE user-
information element, which includes one or more EPSEM service
requests.
C12.22 Response Message
A fully assembled C12.22 APDU that contains an ACSE user-
information element, which includes one or more EPSEM service
responses.
Connection
A logical and physical binding between two or more users of a
service [1].
EPSEM
Extended Protocol Specification for Electronic Metering. EPSEM
defines structures and services used to encode multiple requests
and responses for use by devices such as gas, water, electricity,
and related electronic modules or appliances.
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
Initiating C12.22 IP Node
A role of a C12.22 IP Node in which it initiates the transmission
of a C12.22 Request Message.
Native Address
The term Native Address refers to the transport address that may
be used to reach a C12.22 Node on its C12.22 Network Segment [1].
In this specification the Native Address refers to the Native IP
Address.
Passive-OPEN UDP
Passive-OPEN UDP is a state used by a local C12.22 IP Node to
expect and receive incoming C12.22 Messages from any foreign
C12.22 IP Node using the UDP. When the Passive-OPEN UDP state is
active, the local C12.22 IP Node accepts all C12.22 Messages that
arrive at the local port number that was registered by the local
C12.22 IP Node.
Passive-OPEN TCP
Passive-OPEN TCP is a state used by a local C12.22 IP Node that
wants to establish a TCP connection with an unspecified foreign
C12.22 IP Node using TCP. In this case any foreign C12.22 IP Node
MAY connect to the local C12.22 IP Node as long as the local port
matches the port used by the foreign C12.22 IP Node. The Passive-
OPEN TCP state is identical to "local passive OPEN" defined in
[11].
Responding C12.22 IP Node
A role of a C12.22 IP Node in which it responds to the reception
of a C12.22 Request Message.
Target C12.22 IP Node
The C12.22 IP Node that is the destination for a C12.22 Message.
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
4. The C12.22 IP Network Segment
This section defines the characteristics of the C12.22 IP Network
Segment.
4.1. Composition of a C12.22 IP Network Segment
A C12.22 Network Segment is a collection of C12.22 Nodes that can
communicate with each other directly - without having to forward
C12.22 Messages through a C12.22 Relay.
A C12.22 IP Network Segment comprises C12.22 IP Nodes and the network
infrastructure that enables any one node to reach all other nodes on
the same segment. All C12.22 IP Nodes on the C12.22 IP Network
Segment employ the same IP address encoding scheme (per Figures 1 and
2) and the same network and transport protocols in accordance with
this specification.
There is no restriction on the size of a C12.22 IP Network Segment.
It MAY be as small as a single LAN or subnet, or it MAY include
numerous, heterogeneous LANs and WANs connected by routers, bridges,
and switches. The C12.22 IP Network Segment MAY be completely
private, or include communication across the global Internet.
4.2. Native IP Address
The term Native IP Address denotes a Native Address that MAY be used
to reach a C12.22 Node on its C12.22 IP Network Segment. The Native
IP Address includes the binary IP address, and an OPTIONAL port
number that MAY be followed by an OPTIONAL protocol identifier. The
Native IP Address SHALL be encoded as described in Section 4.3,
Encoding of Native IP Addresses.
The IP address of the C12.22 IP Node MUST be configured before the
C12.22 IP Node attempts to send or receive any C12.22 Message on its
C12.22 IP Network Segment. If the port number is not explicitly
configured by the controlling application, it SHALL be set to the
default port number, 1153 (see Section 4.4, Standardized Port
Numbers).
It is beyond the scope of this specification to define the method of
configuration, the configuration parameters, or any administrative
controls that the system administrator may wish to implement to
assign an IP address.
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
4.3. Encoding of Native IP Addresses
ANSI C12.22 defines binary fields for encoding a C12.22 Native
Address for transport within C12.22 Messages and for storage in
C12.19 Device Tables. In this RFC the fields SHALL contain an IPv4
or an IPv6 binary native IP network address that is followed by an
OPTIONAL two-byte TCP or UDP port number. The TCP or UDP port
number, when present, MAY be followed by an OPTIONAL one-byte
transport protocol identifier ("Protocol" of IPv4 or "Next Header" of
IPv6). The transport protocol identifier SHALL be set to 17 (0x11)
for UDP transport, or to 6 (0x06) for TCP transport, or not set
(absent) for both UDP+TCP transports. The transport protocol values
SHALL be consistent with the C12.22 Node's registered attributes (see
CL and CO flags in Section 5.1, C12.22 Connection Types and TCP/UDP
Transport Modes).
ANSI C12.22 allows the Native Address fields to be conveyed in select
ANSI C12.22 EPSEM service elements (e.g., ANSI C12.22 Registration
Service <native-address> parameter, ANSI C12.22 Resolve Service
response <local-address>, and ANSI C12.19 INTERFACE_CTRL_TBL Element
NATIVE_ADDRESS). The length of the C12.22 Native Address is
qualified by an ANSI C12.22 address length field (e.g., ANSI C12.22
Registration Service <address-length> parameter, ANSI C12.22 Resolve
Service response <local-address-length>, and ANSI C12.19
ACT_NETWORK_TBL Element NATIVE_ADDRESS_LEN).
The ANSI C12.22 Registration Service permits only one Native Address
to be recorded with each registered ApTitle. For this reason, a
C12.22 IP Node that wishes to register different port numbers for UDP
and TCP MUST register twice using different ApTitles.
The binary Native IP Address fields SHALL be encoded in network byte
order as shown in Figure 1.
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
Address IP Address (ADDR), Port (P), Transport (T)
Length Octet
0 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv4 4 | ADDR4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv4+Port 6 | ADDR4 | P |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv4+Port 7 | ADDR4 | P |T|
+Transport +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv6 16 | ADDR6 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv6+Port 18 | ADDR6 | P |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv6+Port 19 | ADDR6 | P |T|
+Transport +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: Encoding of the Native IP Addresses for ANSI C12.22
When an ANSI C12.22 Native Address is encoded in ANSI C12.19 Tables'
BINARY data Elements then the size of the native address Element is
defined by ACT_NETWORK_TBL.NATIVE_ADDRESS_LEN (See [1] and [2] Table
121). This is the actual number of octets that are placed inside the
C12.19 BINARY Element. This value is common to all of the C12.22
Node's interfaces, including those that are not IP based (thus not
conforming to this specification). For this reason the
ACT_NETWORK_TBL.NATIVE_ADDRESS_LEN MAY be greater than, and SHALL NOT
be smaller than, the actual length needed to encode a Native IP
Address per Figure 1. When this is the case, the C12.22 Native IP
Address SHALL be padded with zero (0) to fill the Table's BINARY data
Element.
In instances where the Native IP Address length does not exactly
match any of the Address Lengths listed in Figure 1, the actual
Address Length SHALL be determined by stripping all trailing binary
zeros (0x00) and then adjusting the Address Length upwards to the
next largest value shown in Figure 1.
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
4.4. Standardized Port Numbers
IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) has assigned port 1153 for
UDP [10] and TCP [11] C12.22 IP Messages.
By default, C12.22 IP Nodes SHALL send all C12.22 Application
Association initiation message requests set with 1153 as the
destination port number.
To ensure interoperability among C12.22 IP Nodes, all C12.22 IP
Relays and Master Relays SHALL monitor and accept UDP and TCP
messages destined to port 1153.
Any IP firewalls or Access Control Lists (ACLs) shielding C12.22
Nodes and the IP network MUST be configured to forward UDP and TCP
traffic destined to port 1153 and other ports that are assigned and
registered by the Network administrator, in order to maintain the
continuity of the C12.22 IP Network Segment.
4.5. Use of UDP Source Port 0
Although RFC 768 [10] allows for a source port number of zero (0),
C12.22 IP Nodes SHALL NOT send datagrams on UDP with the source port
set to zero. A C12.22 IP Node SHALL ignore and SHALL NOT respond to
any C12.22 Message that it receives from source port 0.
Further details of C12.22 IP Node's use of UDP, and of TCP, are given
in Section 5, IP Message Transport.
4.6. IP Multicast
In addition to unicast, the ANSI C12.22 protocol requires the support
of a multicast message delivery service from the network. In cases
where C12.22 IP Nodes MUST perform Native IP Address discovery (e.g.,
the discovery of the Native IP Address of C12.22 IP Relays that
provide a route out of the C12.22 IP Network Segment, or the
discovery of the Native IP Address of a C12.22 IP Master Relay on the
C12.22 IP Network), the C12.22 IP Nodes use IP Multicast to send a
C12.22 Message that contains an EPSEM Resolve Service Request on the
IP LAN.
IP multicast is also desirable, for example, when a C12.22 Host needs
to read a multitude of C12.22 Nodes (e.g., meters) that are
configured with a common C12.22 multicast group ApTitle. Using IP
multicast, the C12.22 Host MAY send a C12.22 Message containing an
EPSEM Read Service Request that reaches all C12.22 Nodes on the
C12.22 IP Network Segment.
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
For these reasons, all C12.22 IP Relays and Master Relays SHALL
support IP multicast and it is RECOMMENDED that all C12.22 Nodes
support IP multicast. Any IPv4 C12.22 IP Node that supports IP
multicast SHALL use the Internet Group Management Protocol IGMP
version 1 (IGMPv1) [12] as a minimum, to report (i.e., request)
membership in the C12.22 multicast group to its local router(s).
It is RECOMMENDED that C12.22 IP Nodes implement IGMPv3 [13].
Any IPv6 C12.22 IP Node that supports IP multicast SHALL use
Multicast Listener Discovery version 2 (MLDv2) (RFC 3810 [14])
possibly within ICMPv6 (RFC 4443 [15]) to report membership.
Routers that interconnect C12.22 IP Nodes on the C12.22 IP Network
Segment MUST support Protocol Independent Multicast Sparse Mode (PIM
SM) (RFC 4601 [16]) along with IGMPv1 (RFC 1112 [12]) as a minimum
for IPv4, or MLDv2 for IPv6 (RFC 3810 [14]). It is RECOMMENDED that
they implement IGMPv3 [13]. It is beyond the scope of this
specification to define the mechanism for selecting an initial
Rendezvous Point (RP) for the C12.22 multicast group, the use of
shared versus source trees, or the mechanism for inter-domain
multicast routing.
IANA has registered the "All C1222 Nodes" multicast group, and has
assigned the IPv4 multicast address of 224.0.2.4 and the IPv6
multicast address of FF0X::204, where X represents the Scope field as
defined in RFC 4291, the IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture [17].
For IPv6, all C12.22 IP Relays, C12.22 IP Master Relays, and all
C12.22 IP Nodes configured to support broadcast and multicast (see
Section 5.3, Using IP Broadcast/Multicast) SHALL join the global
scope multicast address, FF0E::204, as well as all of the assigned,
reduced-scope, multicast addresses:
link-local - FF02::204;
admin-local - FF04::204;
site-local - FF05::204; and
organization-local - FF08::204.
IPv6 C12.22 IP Nodes SHOULD use the minimum scope needed, when
initiating IP multicast messages to reach another C12.22 IP Node on
the C12.22 Network. This practice allows the sender to limit
unnecessary propagation of C12.22 IP multicast Messages.
To determine the minimum scope required to reach the closest C12.22
IP Relay on the C12.22 Node's IP Network Segment, this specification
RECOMMENDS the following simple steps:
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
1. Starting with the smallest (local-most) scope, link-local (or a
pre-configured scope), send the C12.22 EPSEM Resolve Service
Request for C12.22 IP Relay discovery.
2. Listen for a response from a C12.22 IP Relay; then:
A. If no response is received, assign the next wider scope
level, then repeat steps (1) and (2) at the newly assigned
scope.
B. If a response is received then record the scope level as the
minimum scope to use on the node's C12.22 IP Network Segment.
A C12.22 IPv6 Node that initiates any EPSEM Service Request SHOULD
use the minimum scope necessary to reach its target C12.22 IP Nodes.
A C12.22 IPv6 Relay SHALL use the global scope for any C12.22 message
destined for the global Internet.
This specification does not preclude the use of the unassigned scope
values defined in [17]; those scope values MAY be used on a private
basis, or through mutual operating agreements.
For IPv4, all C12.22 IP Relays, C12.22 IP Master Relays, and all
C12.22 IP Nodes configured to support broadcast/multicast SHALL join
the assigned multicast address of 224.0.2.4. This global address
does not provide for the type of scoping discussed above for IPv6,
nor is it compatible with the administratively scoped IP multicast
specification in RFC 2365 [18]. Therefore, a different technique to
limit the propagation of C12.22 IP multicast Messages is needed. One
available technique to control IPv4 multicast scope is through the
use of the Time-to-Live (TTL) attribute in the IP packet header.
This attribute is not managed by the C12.22 protocol.
In the implementation of this technique, an administrative domain
MUST include at least one C12.22 IP Relay, and all C12.22 IP Nodes in
the administrative domain SHOULD be configured with a TTL
sufficiently large to reach that C12.22 IP Relay.
A C12.22 IPv4 Node that initiates any C12.22 Request Message SHOULD
use the minimum TTL needed to reach its target C12.22 IP Nodes.
4.7. IP Broadcast
IP broadcast is not generally suitable as a replacement for, or an
alternative to multicast in a C12.22 IP Network Segment. IP
broadcast is not supported in IPv6 and it suffers from limited scope
in IPv4. This specification, however, does not preclude the use of
IP network directed or limited/local scope (address 255.255.255.255)
broadcast within a controlled management domain (as per RFC 2644
[19]).
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
4.8. Encoding of Multicast and Broadcast Addresses
ANSI C12.22 Tables provide binary Elements for encoding a Native
Broadcast or Multicast Address for transport within a C12.22 Message.
The encoding of these Table Elements is identical to that defined in
Section 4.3, Encoding of Native IP Addresses. These fields SHALL be
used as shown in Figure 2.
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
Address IP Address (ADDR), Port (P), Transport (T)
Length Octet
0 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
IPv4 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Broadcast 4 |BADDR4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv4 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Broadcast 6 |BADDR4 | P |
+Port +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv4 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Broadcast 7 |BADDR4 | P |T|
+Port+Transport +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv4 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Multicast 4 |MADDR4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv4 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Multicast 6 |MADDR4 | P |
+Port +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv4 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Multicast 7 |MADDR4 | P |T|
+Port+Transport +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv6 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Multicast 16 | MADDR6 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv6 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Multicast 18 | MADDR6 | P |
+Port +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv6 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Multicast 19 | MADDR6 | P |T|
+Port+Transport +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 2: Encoding of broadcast/multicast native IP addresses
The IPv4 and IPv6 multicast addresses, MADDR4 and MADDR6,
respectively, are those assigned by IANA for use by ANSI C12.22.
When a broadcast/multicast Native IP Address is encoded in ANSI
C12.19 Tables' BINARY data Elements the size of the Native Address
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
Element transmitted is defined by ACT_NETWORK_TBL.NATIVE_ADDRESS_LEN
(See [1] and [2] Table 121). This is the actual number of octets
that are placed inside the C12.19 BINARY Element. This value is
common to all of the C12.22 Node's interfaces, including those that
are not IP based (thus not conforming to this specification). For
this reason the ACT_NETWORK_TBL.NATIVE_ADDRESS_LEN MAY be greater
than, and SHALL NOT be smaller than, the actual length needed to
encode a native IP broadcast/multicast address per Figure 2. When
this is the case, the C12.22 Native IP Address SHALL be padded with
zero (0) to fill the Table's BINARY data Element.
The IPv4 network directed broadcast address can be computed by
performing a bitwise OR between the bit complement of the subnet mask
of the target IP subnet and the IP address of any host on that IP
subnet.
5. IP Message Transport
This section defines a C12.22 Node's usage of the Connection-Oriented
(CO) and Connectionless (CL) transport layer protocols, TCP and UDP,
respectively.
5.1. C12.22 Connection Types and TCP/UDP Transport Modes
A C12.22 IP Node's use of TCP and UDP is based on its registered
capabilities as defined in its configuration parameters (flags) and
as expressed in the Node's accepted registration attributes [1]:
CL Flag = <connection-type>.CONNECTIONLESS_MODE_SUPPORTED;
CL Accept Flag = <connection-type>.ACCEPT_CONNECTIONLESS;
CO Flag = <connection-type>.CONNECTION_MODE_SUPPORTED; and
CO Accept Flag = <connection-type>.ACCEPT_CONNECTIONS.
The mapping of the connection-type parameters to the IP-based
transport variants that a C12.22 Node MAY support is defined in Table
1.
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
+------+------+----------+----------+-------------------------------+
| CL | CO | CL | CO | IP Transport Mode Supported |
| Flag | Flag | Accept | Accept | |
| | | Flag | Flag | |
+------+------+----------+----------+-------------------------------+
| 0 | 0 | x | x | Invalid |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | TCP, Active-OPEN |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | TCP, Passive- and Active-OPEN |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Invalid |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Invalid |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | UDP, Active-OPEN |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Invalid |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | UDP, Passive- and Active-OPEN |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Invalid |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | UDP, Active-OPEN; TCP |
| | | | | Active-OPEN |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | UDP, Active-OPEN; TCP, |
| | | | | Passive- and Active-OPEN |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | UDP, Passive- and |
| | | | | Active-OPEN; TCP, Active-OPEN |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | UDP, Passive- and |
| | | | | Active-OPEN; TCP, Passive- |
| | | | | and Active-OPEN |
+------+------+----------+----------+-------------------------------+
Table 1: C12.22 Node Parameters to IP Transport Mapping
Every C12.22 IP Node MUST support at least one of unicast CO or CL
operating capabilities (as advertized in Decade 12, Network Tables
[1], where available, and as registered using the C12.22 Registration
Service [1]).
5.2. IP Message Transport Details
5.2.1. TCP and UDP Port Use
General rules:
1. A C12.22 IP Node that implements [CL Accept=1] SHALL receive
incoming UDP C12.22 Messages on its registered Native IP Address
(IP address and port number).
2. A C12.22 IP Node that implements [CO Accept=1] SHALL receive
incoming TCP connections on its registered Native IP Address (IP
address and port number).
3. A C12.22 IP Relay that forwards a UDP C12.22 Message to a C12.22
IP Node on the C12.22 IP Network Segment SHALL send the C12.22
Message to the C12.22 IP Node's registered Native IP Address (IP
address, port number).
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
4. A C12.22 IP Relay that forwards a TCP C12.22 Message to a C12.22
IP Node on the C12.22 IP Network Segment MAY use an established
TCP connection to that C12.22 IP Node, or it SHALL establish a
new TCP connection to the C12.22 IP Node's registered Native IP
Address (IP address and port number).
5. A C12.22 IP Node that implements [CL=1] SHOULD set the source
port number in outbound UDP C12.22 Messages to its registered
port number. When the target UDP C12.22 IP Node is reachable
using direct messaging (as defined in [1]), the C12.22 IP Node
MAY set the source port number to a UDP port number that is
different than its registered port number.
6. When the registered Native IP Address of a C12.22 IP Node does
not include the OPTIONAL port number, then port 1153 SHALL be
assumed and used as the registered port number.
7. All C12.22 IP Nodes SHOULD use port 1153 in their Native IP
Address when registering.
5.2.2. Active-OPEN UDP (CL=1, CL Accept=0)
A C12.22 IP Node that supports this mode SHALL NOT monitor for
unsolicited incoming C12.22 Messages via UDP. As a result, the
C12.22 IP Node is incapable of receiving unsolicited C12.22 Messages
using UDP.
The C12.22 IP Node MAY enter the Active-OPEN UDP state by initiating
an unsolicited UDP transmission to a Target C12.22 IP Node, which is
expected to implement the Passive-OPEN UDP mode.
C12.22 IP Nodes SHOULD use their registered UDP port number, or if
not yet registered then they SHOULD use port 1153, as the source port
number for all UDP C12.22 IP Messages.
5.2.3. Passive-OPEN UDP (CL=1, CL Accept=1)
A C12.22 IP Node that operates in this mode SHALL be capable of
receiving solicited and unsolicited C12.22 Messages from other C12.22
IP Nodes. The C12.22 Node MAY change the port number that it
monitors by using the <native-address> parameter of the ANSI C12.22
Registration Service. The C12.22 IP Node MAY initiate unsolicited
Active-OPEN UDP transmissions to other C12.22 IP Nodes that implement
the Passive-OPEN UDP mode.
When operating in this mode, the C12.22 IP Nodes SHALL use their
registered UDP port number as the source port number for all UDP
C12.22 IP Messages.
All C12.22 IP Relays SHALL support the Passive-OPEN UDP mode. C12.22
Authentication Hosts and C12.22 Notification Hosts that implement UDP
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
SHALL support Passive-OPEN UDP mode. For all other C12.22 IP Nodes,
Passive-OPEN UDP mode is the RECOMMENDED mode when implementing UDP.
5.2.4. Active-OPEN TCP Mode (CO=1, CO Accept=0)
A C12.22 IP Node that supports this mode SHALL NOT monitor for
inbound TCP connections. As a result, the node is incapable of
accepting incoming connections via TCP. The C12.22 IP Node MAY
initiate TCP connections to Target C12.22 IP Nodes, which are
expected to implement the Passive-OPEN TCP mode.
In this mode, C12.22 Messages exchanged by a pair of associated
C12.22 IP Nodes can only be communicated through any of the TCP
connections that were initiated by the C12.22 IP Node that implements
this mode. The loss or closure of a connection SHALL NOT
automatically result in the termination of the C12.22 associations
between the peer nodes. In order to continue exchanging C12.22
Messages without loss of association, the initiating C12.22 IP Node
MAY re-establish new TCP connections with the peer node, or use
existing connections to the peer node. The termination of the C12.22
Application associations is dependent upon C12.22 application timeout
attributes and C12.22 link management services (such as Procedure 25
Network Interface Control [1]).
5.2.5. Passive-OPEN TCP Mode (CO=1, CO Accept=1)
A C12.22 IP Node that operates in this mode SHALL monitor and accept
incoming TCP connections. The C12.22 Node May change the port number
that it monitors by using the <native-address> parameter of the ANSI
C12.22 Registration Service. The C12.22 IP Node MAY initiate Active-
OPEN TCP connections to other C12.22 IP Nodes that implement the
Passive-OPEN TCP mode.
In this mode, C12.22 Messages exchanged by a pair of associated
C12.22 IP Nodes can arrive through any of the TCP connections that
were established by either node. The loss or closure of a connection
SHALL NOT automatically result in the termination of the C12.22
associations between the peer nodes. In order to continue exchanging
C12.22 Messages without loss of association, either C12.22 IP Node
MAY re-establish new TCP connections with the peer node, or use
existing connections to the peer node. The termination of the C12.22
Application associations is dependent upon C12.22 application timeout
attributes and C12.22 link management services (such as Procedure 25
Network Interface Control [1]).
All C12.22 IP Relays SHALL support the Passive-OPEN TCP mode. C12.22
Authentication Hosts and C12.22 Notification Hosts that implement TCP
SHALL support Passive-OPEN TCP mode. For all other C12.22 IP Nodes,
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
Passive-OPEN TCP mode is the RECOMMENDED mode when implementing TCP.
5.2.6. TCP and C12.22 Message Directionality
C12.22 IP Nodes MAY use TCP in one of two ways: bi-directional
traffic flow or uni-directional traffic flow.
When TCP connections are used, any new or established TCP connection
between the two C12.22 IP Nodes MAY be used equivalently by the
C12.22 IP Nodes to send and to receive C12.22 Messages. This is the
RECOMMENDED and default mode of operation because ANSI C12.22
requires the transport network to be reliable and connectionless (per
connectionless-mode ACSE). For this reason ANSI C12.22 defines peer-
to-peer application associations and not peer-to-peer connections.
It is known that some C12.22 implementations have been deployed in
which TCP is used for uni-directional traffic flow. For these types
of implementations, an established TCP connection SHALL be used by
the initiator of that connection to send C12.22 Messages and by the
target node (who accepted the connection) to receive C12.22 Messages.
If a C12.22 IP Node wishes to send a C12.22 Message to a peer C12.22
IP Node, it MUST establish and use a new TCP connection or use an
existing TCP connection that it had previously initiated, for its
outbound uni-directional traffic flow.
For increased interoperability, the initiator of the connection
SHOULD accept incoming C12.22 Messages on that connection in case the
target node attempts to use the connection for bi-directional traffic
flow.
Uni-directional use of TCP is a special mode of operation; it is NOT
RECOMMENDED because multiple one-way channel communication is not
described by ANSI C12.22, and it utilizes one-half of the TCP
connection capability. As a result it doubles the number of TCP
connections used to communicate C12.22 Messages, and thus could
become a burden when a large number of connections is required.
5.3. Using IP Broadcast/Multicast
A C12.22 IP Node's use of Broadcast/Multicast is based on its
capabilities as defined in its configuration parameters (flags) and
as expressed in the Node's accepted registration attributes [1]
(<connection-type>.BROADCAST_AND_MULTICAST_SUPPORTED). The mapping
of the C12.22 IP Node's Broadcast/Multicast parameter (flag) to IP
Broadcast/Multicast usage is defined in Table 2.
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
C12.22 Broadcast and IP Broadcast/Multicast Supported
Multicast Supported
Flag
---------------------- ----------------------------------------------
0 The C12.22 IP Node does not accept IP
broadcast and it does not accept IP multicast
messages.
1 The C12.22 IP Node accepts both IP broadcast
(IPv4 only) and IP multicast messages (IPv4
and IPv6).
Table 2: C12.22 to IP Broadcast/Multicast Mapping
If a C12.22 IP Node is configured to accept IP broadcast and
multicast messages, it SHALL join the "All C1222 Nodes" multicast
group (see Section 4.6, IP Multicast), and SHALL use the default port
1153. In addition it SHALL accept IP Network directed or limited
(local scope) broadcast messages sent to port 1153. Note that
successful communication using network directed broadcast requires
configuration of network routers, which by default SHALL NOT forward
directed broadcasts as per RFC 2644 [19].
5.4. Transport Protocol Decisions
5.4.1. Unicast Versus Multicast Versus Broadcast
An initiating C12.22 IP Node MAY send any C12.22 Message using UDP or
TCP. However, in accordance with Section 5.3.2.4.12, Resolve
Service, of ANSI C12.22, it is RECOMMENDED that the C12.22 Resolve
Request message be transported using UDP/IP multicast when the Native
IP Address of the Target C12.22 Node is not known. Use of UDP/IP
multicast is preferred over the use of IP network directed or limited
broadcast; therefore when UDP/IP multicast is supported its use is
RECOMMENDED over network broadcast.
5.4.2. Sending Large C12.22 APDUs Using UDP
When sending via UDP a large C12.22 Message that exceeds the path
MTU, the sender SHALL segment the ACSE APDU in accordance with ANSI
C12.22 Datagram Segmentation and Reassembly algorithm, such that the
size of the resulting IP datagram does not exceed the path MTU, and
thus avoids UDP packet fragmentation. The fundamental issue with
fragmentation exists for both IPv4 and IPv6. Section 3.2 of RFC 5405
[20] provides additional guidelines for determining the appropriate
UDP message side. When path MTU is not known, the sender SHALL
follow the guidelines stipulated in Section 3.2 of RFC 5405 [20]: for
IPv4 use the smaller of 576 bytes and the first-hop MTU [21], and for
IPv6 use 1280 bytes [22]. Sending large APDUs via UDP may lead to
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
network congestion. For more information on avoiding network
congestion see Section 5.6, Congestion Control.
5.4.3. Choice of Protocol for C12.22 Response APDUs
When a Target C12.22 IP Node receives a C12.22 Request Message from
an initiating C12.22 IP Node, it SHALL send a C12.22 Response Message
using the same transport protocol (i.e., TCP to TCP, UDP to UDP).
In the case of UDP, the target SHALL send the C12.22 Response Message
to the source IP address and port number.
5.5. Quality of Service
The ANSI C12.22 standard provides a configuration parameter in the
APDU's <calling-AE-qualifier>.URGENT to mark a message as urgent.
There are numerous IP-based technologies that enable enhanced levels
of message delivery and quality of service. This specification does
not define the technology to be used to send urgent messages over IP.
5.6. Congestion Control
Designers of unicast applications that implement the upper-layers of
C12.22 Messaging over UDP SHOULD follow the congestion control
guidelines in Section 3.1 of RFC 5405 [20].
For the transmission of C12.22 Messages that are greater than what
the TCP initial window would be over a given Internet path, TCP
SHOULD be used rather than UDP as the transport protocol. TCP's
initial window depends on the MSS, which in turn depends on the path
MTU, and is computed according to formula (1) in RFC 3390 [23]. For
unknown path MTUs, the minimum-sized MSS MUST be used and the C12.22
Application SHOULD assume the maximum C12.22 Message size to be 2048
bytes. By using TCP the C12.22 Application benefits from the built-
in TCP congestion control mechanism.
When UDP is the preferred transport mechanism or when UDP multicast
or broadcast are the preferred modes of communication, then the
C12.22 application SHOULD use C12.22 acknowledged Messages that are
smaller than TCP's initial window over the return path, as computed
by formula (1) in [23] and described above. The size of the C12.22
Message MAY be managed through the use of ANSI C12.22 EPSEM Partial
Table Read/Write service requests and responses.
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
6. Security Considerations
The ANSI C12.22 Application layer security is defined in Section
5.3.4.13, C12.22 Security Mechanism, of the ANSI C12.22 standard.
The security mechanisms include provisions for message privacy and
authentication, playback rejection, and message acceptance windows as
well as ANSI C12.19 [2] role-based data access and secured register
mechanisms. The ANSI C12.22 Application layer default security
mechanism provides three options to choose from when sending C12.22
Messages:
1. Sending clear text messages over the C12.22 Network [1], [6],
which MAY result in altered C12.22 Messages and exposure to
password sniffing attacks, as described in RFC 3552 [24].
2. Sending of authenticated plain text messages over the C12.22
Network [1], [6], which MAY result in password sniffing attacks
as described in RFC 3552 [24].
3. Sending of authenticated cipher text over the C12.22 Network
providing for message and peer node authentication and privacy.
When option 1 is used then it is RECOMMENDED that the network or
transport layer provide authentication and confidentiality service.
When option 2 is used then it is RECOMMENDED that the network or
transport layer provide confidentiality services. When option 3 is
used then no additional network or transport layer security services
are necessary.
Additional Transport or Network layer security protocols are not
required by ANSI C12.22, but they MAY be provided transparently by
C12.22 IP Network Segment integrators (e.g., in C12.22 IP Relays) in
order to improve on the security provisions cited above. However,
any added Transport security (e.g., TLS, RFC 5246 [27]) or IP
security (e.g., IPsec, RFC 4302 [25], RFC 4303 [26], RFC 5996 [28])
features SHALL act only to enhance (i.e., not be a substitute for, or
an alteration of) the interoperable ANSI C12.22 and ANSI C12.19
security provisions, and SHALL NOT corrupt and SHALL NOT alter the
C12.22 Message as presented by the C12.22 Application layer.
The ANSI C12.22 [1] and ANSI C12.19 [2] standards provide for the
transmission of keys and their storage in C12.19 End Devices (e.g.,
meters and Head-end systems). The key management protocol (when and
how keys are exchanged) is not described in the ANSI C12.22 [1] and
ANSI C12.19 [2] standards, except to state that keys MAY not be
readable from a C12.19 End Device (in response to a read service
request). It is RECOMMENDED that all C12.22 Nodes encrypt user
information element key fields and passwords. It is also RECOMMENDED
that all C12.22 Nodes mask user information element key fields and
password fields of EPSEM Read Service Responses (e.g., by replacing
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
all key and password bytes with zeros (0x00) or spaces (0x20)).
Legacy deployments exist that are not connected to the Internet, so
there are some implementations that do not include security. It is
likely that multi-homed C12.22 Nodes with interfaces to the Internet
will exist in future deployments, so security mechanisms MUST be used
by those C12.22 Nodes to ensure C12.22 Message authentication and
confidentiality.
7. IANA Considerations
UDP and TCP port 1153, which is used for C12.22 communication over
IP, is registered with IANA.
Section 4.6, IP Multicast defines the use of multicast. The
following multicast addresses have been registered by IANA for use by
the ANSI C12.22 standard:
IPv4 - "All C1222 Nodes" address 224.0.2.4
IPv6 - "All C1222 Nodes" address FF0X::204
8. Acknowledgments
The authors wish to recognize Alexander Shulgin for providing
valuable comments and for conducting feasibility testing in support
of this work.
The following people have improved this document through thoughtful
comments and suggestions: Fred Baker, Ralph Droms, Vijay Gurbani,
Michael Stuber, Spencer Dawkins, Alfred Hoenes, Russ Housley, Paul
Hoffman, Lars Eggert and Sean Turner.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[1] ANSI, "Protocol Specification for Interfacing to Data
Communication Networks", ANSI C12.22-2008, January 2009.
[2] ANSI, "Utility Industry End Device Data Tables", ANSI C12.19-
2008, February 2009.
[3] IEEE, "Draft Standard for Utility Industry Metering
Communication Protocol Application Layer (End Device Data
Tables)", IEEE P1377-2010, October 2010.
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
[4] Measurement Canada, "Specification for Utility Industry
Metering Communication Protocol Application Layer (End Device
Data Tables)", Draft MC12.19-2010.
[5] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[6] IEEE, "Standard for Local Area Network/Wide Area Network (LAN/
WAN) Node Communication Protocol to Complement the Utility
Industry End Device Data Tables", IEEE P1703-2010,
October 2010.
[7] Measurement Canada, "Specification for Local Area Network/Wide
Area Network (LAN/WAN) Node Communication Protocol to
Complement the Utility Industry End Device Data Tables",
Draft MC12.19, 2010.
[8] ISO/IEC, "Information Technology-Open Systems Interconnection-
Connectionless Protocol for the Association Control Service
Element: Protocol Specification", ISO/IEC 10035-1, 1995.
[9] ISO/IEC, "Information Technology-ASN.1 Encoding Rules:
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding
Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)", ISO/
IEC 8825-1, 2002.
[10] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768,
August 1980.
[11] Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7, RFC 793,
September 1981.
[12] Deering, S., "Host extensions for IP multicasting", STD 5,
RFC 1112, August 1989.
[13] Cain, B., Deering, S., Kouvelas, I., Fenner, B., and A.
Thyagarajan, "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 3",
RFC 3376, October 2002.
[14] Vida, R. and L. Costa, "Multicast Listener Discovery Version 2
(MLDv2) for IPv6", RFC 3810, June 2004.
[15] Conta, A., Deering, S., and M. Gupta, "Internet Control Message
Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)
Specification", RFC 4443, March 2006.
[16] Fenner, B., Handley, M., Holbrook, H., and I. Kouvelas,
"Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM):
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
Protocol Specification (Revised)", RFC 4601, August 2006.
[17] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture", RFC 4291, February 2006.
[18] Meyer, D., "Administratively Scoped IP Multicast", BCP 23,
RFC 2365, July 1998.
[19] Senie, D., "Changing the Default for Directed Broadcasts in
Routers", BCP 34, RFC 2644, August 1999.
[20] Eggert, L. and G. Fairhurst, "Unicast UDP Usage Guidelines for
Application Designers", BCP 145, RFC 5405, November 2008.
[21] Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Communication
Layers", STD 3, RFC 1122, October 1989.
[22] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)
Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998.
[23] Allman, M., Floyd, S., and C. Partridge, "Increasing TCP's
Initial Window", RFC 3390, October 2002.
[24] Rescorla, E. and B. Korver, "Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on
Security Considerations", BCP 72, RFC 3552, July 2003.
9.2. Informative References
[25] Kent, S., "IP Authentication Header", RFC 4302, December 2005.
[26] Kent, S., "IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)", RFC 4303,
December 2005.
[27] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS)
Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246, August 2008.
[28] Kaufman, C., Hoffman, P., Nir, Y., and P. Eronen, "Internet Key
Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)", RFC 5996, September 2010.
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft ANSI C12.22/IEEE 1703/MC12.22 Over IP January 2011
Authors' Addresses
Avygdor Moise
Future DOS R&D Inc.
#303 - 6707 Elbow Drive SW
Calgary, Alberta T2V 0E5
Canada
Email: avy@fdos.ca
URI: http://www.fdos.ca
Jonathan Brodkin
Future DOS R&D Inc.
#303 - 6707 Elbow Drive SW
Calgary, Alberta T2V 0E5
Canada
Email: jonathan.brodkin@fdos.ca
URI: http://www.fdos.ca
Moise & Brodkin Expires July 14, 2011 [Page 26]