%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix instead of this I-D.
@techreport{boucadair-6man-prefix-routing-reco-03,
    number =    {draft-boucadair-6man-prefix-routing-reco-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-6man-prefix-routing-reco/03/},
    author =    {Mohamed Boucadair and Alexandre Petrescu},
    title =     {{IPv6 Prefix Length Recommendation for Forwarding}},
    pagetotal = 4,
    year =      2014,
    month =     sep,
    day =       24,
    abstract =  {The length of IP prefixes is an information used by forwarding and routing processes is policy-based. As such, no maximum length must be assumed by design. Discussions on the 64-bit boundary in IPv6 addressing revealed a need for a clear recommendation on which bits must be used by forwarding decision-making processes. This document sketches a recommendation to be followed by forwarding and routing designs with regards to the prefix length. The aim is to avoid hard-coded routing and forwarding designs that exclude some IP prefix lengths.},
}