The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)
draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-31
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(6man WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Ron Bonica , Yuji Kamite , Andrew Alston , Daniam Henriques , Luay Jalil | ||
Last updated | 2023-11-20 (Latest revision 2023-06-23) | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-6man-comp-rtg-hdr | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | Adopted by a WG | |
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-6man-comp-rtg-hdr | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes an experiment in which two new IPv6 Routing headers are implemented and deployed. Collectively, they are called the Compact Routing Headers (CRH). Individually, they are called CRH-16 and CRH-32. One purpose of this experiment is to demonstrate that the CRH can be implemented and deployed in a production network. Another purpose is to demonstrate that the security considerations, described in this document, can be addressed with access control lists. Finally, this document encourages replication of the experiment.
Authors
Ron Bonica
Yuji Kamite
Andrew Alston
Daniam Henriques
Luay Jalil
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)