IP Multicast in Differentiated Services (DS) Networks
draft-bless-diffserv-multicast-07
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2004-04-05
|
07 | Bill Fenner | [Note]: 'In author''s 48 hours' added by Bill Fenner |
2004-04-05
|
07 | Bill Fenner | From: RFC Editor Subject: authors 48 hours: RFC 3754 NOW AVAILABLE Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 16:25:03 -0700 To: bless@tm.uka.de … From: RFC Editor Subject: authors 48 hours: RFC 3754 NOW AVAILABLE Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 16:25:03 -0700 To: bless@tm.uka.de, klaus@wehrle.com Cc: RFC Editor , Bill Fenner |
2003-12-09
|
07 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2003-12-08
|
07 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2003-12-08
|
07 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2003-12-08
|
07 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2003-12-08
|
07 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2003-12-04
|
07 | Amy Vezza | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-12-04 by Amy Vezza |
2003-12-04
|
07 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2003-12-01
|
07 | Amy Vezza | Telechat date was changed to 2003-12-04 from 2003-10-16 by Amy Vezza |
2003-12-01
|
07 | Bill Fenner | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Bill Fenner |
2003-12-01
|
07 | Bill Fenner | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-10-16 by Bill Fenner |
2003-12-01
|
07 | Bill Fenner | [Note]: 'Return to agenda to ask Russ about introduction' added by Bill Fenner |
2003-11-13
|
07 | Bill Fenner | State Change Notice email list have been change to , , from , |
2003-11-13
|
07 | Bill Fenner | From Roland: the abstract and intro, as they currently read, were suggested by the RFC editor. However, I'll try to provide one-two sentences summary about … From Roland: the abstract and intro, as they currently read, were suggested by the RFC editor. However, I'll try to provide one-two sentences summary about the problem. Should we submit another draft, or, to whom should we provide the additions? -- As said before, the current abstract and intro are a suggestion from the RFC editor which we adopted. However, I tried to express the main problems in a few sentences (not an easy task...). Here is the proposal: Replicated multicast packets normally get the same forwarding treatment as the original packets (because of the copied DiffServ codepoint). Due to the dynamic creation of multicast branches, it is difficult to control the amount of network resources that are consumed by multicast traffic. This leads to situations where other flows (even unicast traffic) are affected adversely by multicast traffic. Maybe a native speaker can still improve or even shorten this. |
2003-10-20
|
07 | Amy Vezza | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-10-16 by Amy Vezza |
2003-10-16
|
07 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2003-10-15
|
07 | Russ Housley | The first paragraph of the Introduction really is poor. It says: This document discusses the problems of IP Multicast use in … The first paragraph of the Introduction really is poor. It says: This document discusses the problems of IP Multicast use in Differentiated Services (DS) networks, expanding on the discussion in RFC 2475 ("An Architecture of Differentiated Services"). It also suggests possible solutions to these problems, describes a potential implementation model, and presents simulation results. What are "these problems?" I expected the introduction to list the problems for which it proposes solutions. |
2003-10-09
|
07 | Bill Fenner | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-10-16 by Bill Fenner |
2003-10-09
|
07 | Bill Fenner | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Publication Requested by Bill Fenner |
2003-09-29
|
07 | Bill Fenner | State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Bill Fenner |
2003-09-29
|
07 | Bill Fenner | From: RFC Editor Subject: Informational RFC to be: draft-bless-diffserv-multicast-07.txt Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:50:24 -0700 To: IESG , iesg-secretary Cc: … From: RFC Editor Subject: Informational RFC to be: draft-bless-diffserv-multicast-07.txt Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:50:24 -0700 To: IESG , iesg-secretary Cc: RFC Editor , bless@tm.uka.de, klaus@wehrle.com IESG, This RFC-to-be was submitted to the RFC Editor to be published as Informational: draft-bless-diffserv-multicast-07.txt. Four week timeout is initiated (27 October 2003). |
2003-09-29
|
07 | Bill Fenner | State Change Notice email list have been change to , from , |
2003-09-29
|
07 | Bill Fenner | Status date has been changed to 2003-10-27 from |
2003-08-04
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-bless-diffserv-multicast-07.txt |
2003-03-18
|
07 | Bill Fenner | I've been talking with Roland about this draft since Salt Lake City; I'm happy with its content now and expect it to come in via … I've been talking with Roland about this draft since Salt Lake City; I'm happy with its content now and expect it to come in via the RFC Editor. |
2003-03-18
|
07 | Bill Fenner | Draft Added by Fenner, Bill |
2003-02-25
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-bless-diffserv-multicast-06.txt |
2002-11-22
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-bless-diffserv-multicast-05.txt |
2002-07-05
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-bless-diffserv-multicast-04.txt |
2002-03-07
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-bless-diffserv-multicast-03.txt |
2001-11-27
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-bless-diffserv-multicast-02.txt |
2000-11-22
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-bless-diffserv-multicast-01.txt |
1999-09-10
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-bless-diffserv-multicast-00.txt |