IS-IS and OSPF Difference Discussions
draft-bhatia-manral-diff-isis-ospf-01

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual in gen area)
Last updated 2006-02-02 (latest revision 2005-07-22)
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream WG state (None)
Document shepherd No shepherd assigned
IESG IESG state Expired (IESG: Dead)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD Alex Zinin
Send notices to manav@samsung.com; danny@arbor.net; Vishwas@sinett.com, yasu@sfc.wide.ad.jp; manav@riverstonenet.com

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bhatia-manral-diff-isis-ospf-01.txt

Abstract

The increasing popularity of IS-IS [IS-IS] and OSPF [OSPF] over the years has drawn significant attention to the relative merits and de-merits of one with respect to the other. This draft presents an elaborate comparison between the two routing protocols to explain how the features and functionalities of one differs from the other. Wherever applicable the differences between OSPFv2 and OSPFv3[OSPFv3] have also been pointed out.

Authors

Manav Bhatia (manav@lucent.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)