%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp instead of this I-D. @techreport{barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-03, number = {draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-03}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/03/}, author = {Mike Koldychev and Siva Sivabalan and Colby Barth and Cheng Li}, title = {{PCEP extension to support Segment Routing Policy Candidate Paths}}, pagetotal = 18, year = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.year' **, month = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date' **, day = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.day' **, abstract = {This document introduces a mechanism to specify an Segment Routing (SR) policy, as a collection of SR candidate paths. An SR policy is identified by \textless{}headend, color, end-point\textgreater{} tuple. An SR policy can contain one or more candidate paths where each candidate path is identified in PCEP via an PLSP-ID. This document proposes extension to PCEP to support association among candidate paths of a given SR policy. The mechanism proposed in this document is applicable to both MPLS and IPv6 data planes of SR.}, }