Proactive Connection Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile
draft-asm-mpls-tp-bfd-cc-cv-04
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | David Allan , John Drake , George Swallow , Sami Boutros , Siva Sivabalan , David Ward | ||
Last updated | 2010-06-03 (Latest revision 2010-05-11) | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-mpls-tp-bfd-cc-cv | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-mpls-tp-bfd-cc-cv | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Continuity Check (CC), Proactive Connectivity Verification (CV) and Remote Defect Indication (RDI) functionalities required for are MPLS- TP OAM. Continuity Check monitors the integrity of the continuity of the path for any loss of continuity defect. Connectivity verification monitors the integrity of the routing of the path between sink and source for any connectivity issues. RDI enables an End Point to report, to its associated End Point, a fault or defect condition that it detects on a PW, LSP or Section. This document specifies methods for proactive CV, CC, and RDI for MPLS-TP Label Switched Path (LSP), PWs and Sections using Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD). Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 [1].
Authors
David Allan
John Drake
George Swallow
Sami Boutros
Siva Sivabalan
David Ward
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)