Skip to main content

Alternative Certificate Formats for the Public-Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX) Certificate Management Protocols
draft-adams-cmpaltcert-06

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Steven Bellovin
2005-04-20
06 (System) New version available: draft-adams-cmpaltcert-06.txt
2004-11-15
05 (System) New version available: draft-adams-cmpaltcert-05.txt
2004-05-06
04 (System) New version available: draft-adams-cmpaltcert-04.txt
2004-04-13
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-04-12
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-04-12
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-04-09
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-04-09
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-04-09
06 (System) IESG has approved the document
2004-04-08
06 (System) Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-04-08
06 Russ Housley State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Russ Housley
2004-04-02
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-04-02
06 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot comment]
The security considerations section is inadequate.  The phrase "this entire memo is about security" should be banned...  Does use of this format introduce …
[Ballot comment]
The security considerations section is inadequate.  The phrase "this entire memo is about security" should be banned...  Does use of this format introduce any new risks?  Quite possibly -- the situation seems analogous to downgrade attacks.  Are there other risks?
2004-04-02
06 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Steve Bellovin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Steve Bellovin
2004-04-02
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot comment]
Violates the use of fqdns

    "Alice "

Should probably be alice@example.com ??

There are multiple of those
2004-04-02
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-04-01
06 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-04-01
06 Steven Bellovin [Ballot comment]
-
2004-04-01
06 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot discuss]
The security considerations section is inadequate.  The phrase "this entire memo is about security" should be banned...  Does use of this format introduce …
[Ballot discuss]
The security considerations section is inadequate.  The phrase "this entire memo is about security" should be banned...  Does use of this format introduce any new risks?  Quite possibly -- the situation seems analogous to downgrade attacks.  Are there other risks?
2004-04-01
06 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Steve Bellovin has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Steve Bellovin
2004-04-01
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-03-29
06 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot comment]
The security considerations section is inadequate.  The phrase "this entire memo is about security" should be banned...  Does use of this format introduce …
[Ballot comment]
The security considerations section is inadequate.  The phrase "this entire memo is about security" should be banned...  Does use of this format introduce any new risks?  Quite possibly -- the situation seems analogous to downgrade attacks.  Are there other risks?
2004-03-29
06 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-03-24
06 Russ Housley Telechat date was changed to 2004-04-02 from 2004-04-01 by Russ Housley
2004-03-17
06 Scott Hollenbeck
[Ballot comment]
I really think the Security Considerations section of this document could be better written to address the topics described in RFC 3552/BCP …
[Ballot comment]
I really think the Security Considerations section of this document could be better written to address the topics described in RFC 3552/BCP 72, even if only to say that there are no issues with authentication, authorization, privacy, etc.
2004-03-17
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] Position for Scott Hollenbeck has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-03-17
06 Scott Hollenbeck
[Ballot comment]
I really think the Security COnsiderations section of this document could be better written to address the topics described in RFC 3552/BCP …
[Ballot comment]
I really think the Security COnsiderations section of this document could be better written to address the topics described in RFC 3552/BCP 72, even if only to say that there are no issues with authentication, authorization, privacy, etc.
2004-03-17
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-03-16
06 Russ Housley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation::External Party by Russ Housley
2004-03-16
06 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-04-01 by Russ Housley
2004-03-16
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2004-03-16
06 Russ Housley Ballot has been issued by Russ Housley
2004-03-16
06 Russ Housley Created "Approve" ballot
2004-03-16
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-03-16
06 (System) Last call text was added
2004-03-16
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-03-08
03 (System) New version available: draft-adams-cmpaltcert-03.txt
2004-03-03
06 Russ Housley State Changes to AD Evaluation::External Party from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Russ Housley
2004-01-26
06 Russ Housley State Changes to AD Evaluation::AD Followup from AD Evaluation by Russ Housley
2004-01-26
06 Russ Housley
The bulk of draft-adams-cmpaltcert-02.txt is about CRMF (not CMP).  Sections 2 and 3.3.6 are exclusively about CMP, but the rest is really about CRMF.  Therefore, …
The bulk of draft-adams-cmpaltcert-02.txt is about CRMF (not CMP).  Sections 2 and 3.3.6 are exclusively about CMP, but the rest is really about CRMF.  Therefore, a title change and a change in the introduction is appropriate so that other protocols that make use of CRMF to be able to leverage this work.
2004-01-26
06 Russ Housley Area acronymn has been changed to sec from gen
2004-01-14
06 Russ Housley State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Russ Housley
2003-12-04
06 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-12-04 by Amy Vezza
2003-12-04
06 Amy Vezza Shepherding AD has been changed to Russ Housley from Harald Alvestrand
2003-11-25
06 Dinara Suleymanova Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-12-04 by Dinara Suleymanova
2003-11-25
06 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova
2003-10-13
02 (System) New version available: draft-adams-cmpaltcert-02.txt
2003-09-16
01 (System) New version available: draft-adams-cmpaltcert-01.txt
2000-07-06
00 (System) New version available: draft-adams-cmpaltcert-00.txt