Skip to main content

IETF conflict review for draft-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding
conflict-review-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding-00

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2017-03-06
00 Amy Vezza
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: Nevil Brownlee ,
    draft-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding@ietf.org,
    rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Cc: IETF-Announce ,
    …
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: Nevil Brownlee ,
    draft-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding@ietf.org,
    rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Cc: IETF-Announce ,
    The IESG ,
    iana@iana.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding-05

The IESG has completed a review of draft-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding-05
consistent with RFC5742.


The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Huawei's GRE Tunnel
Bonding Protocol'  as an
Informational RFC.


The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document
and IETF work.

The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the
comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine
whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may
exist in both the ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary



2017-03-06
00 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the conflict review response
2017-03-06
00 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2017-03-06
00 Amy Vezza Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent
2017-03-02
00 Cindy Morgan Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation
2017-03-02
00 Mirja Kühlewind [Ballot Position Update] Position for Mirja Kühlewind has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2017-03-02
00 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2017-03-01
00 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2017-03-01
00 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2017-03-01
00 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell
2017-03-01
00 Mirja Kühlewind
[Ballot discuss]
I still don't understand how this works because I believe they are still thinking about forming a banana bof. Does the publication of …
[Ballot discuss]
I still don't understand how this works because I believe they are still thinking about forming a banana bof. Does the publication of this solution on the IS track meant this will not be considered in a future banana group anymore?

I mean yes this document does not conflict with current IETF work but it might conflict with future work that we already knoa about...
2017-03-01
00 Mirja Kühlewind [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind
2017-03-01
00 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2017-03-01
00 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2017-02-28
00 Terry Manderson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson
2017-02-28
00 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2017-02-28
00 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2017-02-27
00 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot comment]
I'm a Yes, since I'm not seeing this mechanism being discussed in the BANANA community.
2017-02-27
00 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2017-02-24
00 Suresh Krishnan [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan
2017-02-24
00 Suresh Krishnan Created "Approve" ballot
2017-02-24
00 Suresh Krishnan Conflict Review State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review
2017-02-24
00 Suresh Krishnan New version available: conflict-review-zhang-gre-tunnel-bonding-00.txt
2017-02-13
00 Suresh Krishnan Telechat date has been changed to 2017-03-02 from 2017-02-16
2017-01-24
00 Suresh Krishnan Conflict Review State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd
2017-01-19
00 Suresh Krishnan Telechat date has been changed to 2017-02-16 from 2017-02-02
2017-01-19
00 Jari Arkko Telechat date has been changed to 2017-02-02 from 2017-01-19
2017-01-19
00 Jari Arkko Shepherding AD changed to Suresh Krishnan
2017-01-11
00 Cindy Morgan Placed on agenda for telechat - 2017-01-19
2017-01-11
00 Nevil Brownlee IETF conflict review requested