IETF conflict review for draft-wilde-xml-patch
conflict-review-wilde-xml-patch-00

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2014-06-18)
No email
send info
This is related to earlier http-patch and json-patch work, and borrows from those.  It's not in conflict with anything going on now, and it's gotten a review on the media-types list.

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2014-06-23)
No email
send info
I certainly agree there's nothing here conflicting with IETF work. I presume that the ISE is trying to be cognizant of whether this conflicts with W3C work.

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info