IETF conflict review for draft-pornin-deterministic-dsa
conflict-review-pornin-deterministic-dsa-00
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2013-05-28
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-pornin-deterministic-dsa@tools.ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-pornin-deterministic-dsa@tools.ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-pornin-deterministic-dsa-01 The IESG has completed a review of draft-pornin-deterministic-dsa-01 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Deterministic Usage of DSA and ECDSA Digital Signature Algorithms' as an Informational RFC. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work. The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-pornin-deterministic-dsa/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pornin-deterministic-dsa/ The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary |
|
2013-05-28
|
00 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the conflict review response |
|
2013-05-28
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2013-05-28
|
00 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent |
|
2013-05-28
|
00 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from Approved No Problem - point raised |
|
2012-10-11
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved No Problem - point raised from IESG Evaluation |
|
2012-10-11
|
00 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot comment] The header of the document now says "Internet Engineering Task Force". That is incorrect. Please fix before publication. |
|
2012-10-11
|
00 | Pete Resnick | Ballot comment text updated for Pete Resnick |
|
2012-10-11
|
00 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss |
|
2012-10-11
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] There was a bunch of mail discussing this on the CFRG list but I'm not clear if that reached closure or not. It … [Ballot comment] There was a bunch of mail discussing this on the CFRG list but I'm not clear if that reached closure or not. It would be good if the ISE wanted to check with the chairs of the CFRG to see if they think there are any comments there that might usefully be addressed before this becomes an RFC. (In particular I don't think I saw the author answering those comments but perhaps he's not on the CFRG list?) |
|
2012-10-11
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
|
2012-10-11
|
00 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
|
2012-10-11
|
00 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo |
|
2012-10-08
|
00 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot discuss] The header of the document is as follows: Internet Engineering Task Force … [Ballot discuss] The header of the document is as follows: Internet Engineering Task Force T. Pornin Internet-Draft August 27, 2012 Intended status: Informational Expires: February 28, 2013 Note the "Internet Engineering Task Force" on the top line. That's just wrong. Do we assume that the RFC Editor will fix that and I move to "No Objection" or shall I hold the "Discuss" until that is corrected? |
|
2012-10-08
|
00 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
|
2012-10-08
|
00 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
|
2012-10-08
|
00 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks |
|
2012-10-08
|
00 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley |
|
2012-10-08
|
00 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica |
|
2012-10-08
|
00 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
|
2012-10-08
|
00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
|
2012-10-07
|
00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
|
2012-10-05
|
00 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Sean Turner |
|
2012-10-05
|
00 | Sean Turner | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2012-10-05
|
00 | Sean Turner | State changed to IESG Evaluation from Needs Shepherd |
|
2012-10-05
|
00 | Sean Turner | New version available: conflict-review-pornin-deterministic-dsa-00.txt |
|
2012-10-03
|
00 | Sean Turner | Shepherding AD changed to Sean Turner |
|
2012-09-27
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | The draft draft-pornin-deterministic-dsa-01 is ready for publication from the Independent Stream. Please ask IESG to review it, as set out in RFC 5742. The … The draft draft-pornin-deterministic-dsa-01 is ready for publication from the Independent Stream. Please ask IESG to review it, as set out in RFC 5742. The following is some background for this draft, please forward it to IESG along with this request ... This draft is about Deterministic digital signatures, which its abstract says "can be more easily implemented in various environments since they do not need access to a source of high quality randomness. It was submitted to me in April 2011; Jim Schaad reviewed it and pointed out a few problems. At the end of August the author made the changes in this -01 version - Jim says it's OK now. Thanks, Nevil (ISE) -- Nevil Brownlee (ISE), rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org |
|
2012-09-27
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-10-11 |
|
2012-09-27
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | IETF conflict review requested |