IETF conflict review for draft-melnikov-mmhs-authorizing-users
conflict-review-melnikov-mmhs-authorizing-users-00
Yes
(Barry Leiba)
(Ben Campbell)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-03-17)
Unknown
I had a quick read and have one question. Otherwise it seems fine, if very specialised. (But hey, it's MMHS:-) - 3.3 says: "one example is by verifying the S/MIME signature, making sure that the signature protects all header fields" huh? When do smime signatures cover header fields?
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown