IETF conflict review for draft-melnikov-mmhs-authorizing-users

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

(Ben Campbell) Yes

Barry Leiba Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

Comment (2016-03-17)
No email
send info
I had a quick read and have one question. Otherwise it seems
fine, if very specialised. (But hey, it's MMHS:-)

- 3.3 says: "one example is by verifying the S/MIME signature,
 making sure that the signature protects all header fields" huh?
When do smime signatures cover header fields?

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection