IETF conflict review for draft-melnikov-mmhs-authorizing-users
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
(Ben Campbell) Yes
Barry Leiba Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Alia Atlas) No Objection
Deborah Brungard No Objection
(Benoît Claise) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
I had a quick read and have one question. Otherwise it seems fine, if very specialised. (But hey, it's MMHS:-) - 3.3 says: "one example is by verifying the S/MIME signature, making sure that the signature protects all header fields" huh? When do smime signatures cover header fields?