Skip to main content

IETF conflict review for draft-mavrogiannopoulos-pkcs8-validated-parameters
conflict-review-mavrogiannopoulos-pkcs8-validated-parameters-01

Yes

(Alissa Cooper)
(Mirja Kühlewind)

No Objection

(Adam Roach)
(Benjamin Kaduk)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Ignas Bagdonas)
(Martin Vigoureux)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Terry Manderson)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00) Unknown

                            
Eric Rescorla Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2018-06-21) Unknown
Because it extends a document (RFC 5208) that was published via the IETF process, the appropriate way to proceed is for this to go through the IETF process as well, specifically  SECDISPATCH. If the IETF decides it does not want to take it on, then we can revisit this question.
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00) Unknown

                            
Adam Roach Former IESG member
(was No Record, Yes) No Objection
No Objection (for -00) Unknown

                            
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2018-06-19 for -00) Unknown
I do not object to the conclusion per se, but I note that Adrian argues (in the shepherd writeup) that this is an implementation option that does not need to update RFC 5208 or RFC 5958.

 I am agnostic about the correctness of either position.
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00) Unknown

                            
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00) Unknown

                            
Ignas Bagdonas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00) Unknown

                            
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00) Unknown

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00) Unknown

                            
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00) Unknown