IETF conflict review for draft-manning-opcode-discover
conflict-review-manning-opcode-discover-00
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-09-17
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-manning-opcode-discover@tools.ietf.org, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-manning-opcode-discover@tools.ietf.org, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-manning-opcode-discover-06 The IESG has completed a review of draft-manning-opcode-discover-06 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'DISCOVER: Supporting Multicast DNS Queries' as an Historic RFC. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG dnsext, but this relationship does not prevent publishing. The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-manning-opcode-discover/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-manning-opcode-discover/ The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary |
2012-09-17
|
00 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the conflict review response |
2012-09-17
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2012-09-17
|
00 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent |
2012-09-13
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation |
2012-09-13
|
00 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo |
2012-09-13
|
00 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot comment] Thanks to Sean for unearthing the cause of the DNP and putting my concerns to rest. |
2012-09-13
|
00 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss |
2012-09-12
|
00 | Wesley Eddy | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy |
2012-09-12
|
00 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot discuss] This is a discuss discuss which I anticipate clearing on or by the call. It is hard to figure this out without the … [Ballot discuss] This is a discuss discuss which I anticipate clearing on or by the call. It is hard to figure this out without the diff tool working, but the original document was DNP by the IESG of the day and it is not clear whether or not the reasons for that are fully articulated, and whether there is any remaining residual risk in publication. |
2012-09-12
|
00 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant |
2012-09-12
|
00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2012-09-12
|
00 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2012-09-12
|
00 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2012-09-11
|
00 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley |
2012-09-11
|
00 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks |
2012-09-10
|
00 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2012-09-10
|
00 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner |
2012-09-10
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2012-09-10
|
00 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2012-09-10
|
00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot comment] This Comment is provided for consideration by the ISE and author. --- It would be helpful if the Abstract, as well as noting … [Ballot comment] This Comment is provided for consideration by the ISE and author. --- It would be helpful if the Abstract, as well as noting that the experiment was run in the 90s, also noted the how/why of this being a historic record, not an on-going experiment. Stating this in terms of the purpose of the document (as the last paragraph of Section 1) might be a good way to do it. |
2012-09-10
|
00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2012-09-10
|
00 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ralph Droms |
2012-09-10
|
00 | Ralph Droms | Created "Approve" ballot |
2012-09-10
|
00 | Ralph Droms | State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review |
2012-09-10
|
00 | Ralph Droms | Removed telechat returning item indication |
2012-09-10
|
00 | Ralph Droms | New version available: conflict-review-manning-opcode-discover-00.txt |
2012-08-29
|
00 | Ralph Droms | Telechat date has been changed to 2012-09-13 from 2012-08-30 |
2012-08-29
|
00 | Ralph Droms | State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd |
2012-08-29
|
00 | Ralph Droms | Shepherding AD changed to Ralph Droms |
2012-08-28
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | The draft draft-manning-opcode-discover-06.txt is ready for publication from the Independent Stream. Please ask IESG to review it, as set out in RFC 5742. The … The draft draft-manning-opcode-discover-06.txt is ready for publication from the Independent Stream. Please ask IESG to review it, as set out in RFC 5742. The following is some background for this draft, please forward it to IESG along with this request ... Bill Manning originally submitted this draft back in 2004. It ran into problems into 2011, resulting in the IESG note for it in the Tracker. After discussions with me in November 2011, Bill has rewritten it as a Historical draft, documenting a DARPA (i.e. non-IETF) multicast-DNS project from the mid-90s. With that in mind, it uses that project's final report to provide background information. It does not request any IANA codepoints. Thanks, Nevil (ISE) -- Nevil Brownlee (ISE), rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org |
2012-08-28
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-08-30 |
2012-08-28
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | IETF conflict review requested |