IETF conflict review for draft-manning-opcode-discover
conflict-review-manning-opcode-discover-00

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

(Ralph Droms) Yes

(Stewart Bryant) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2012-09-13)
No email
send info
Thanks to Sean for unearthing the cause of the DNP and putting my concerns to rest.

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Wesley Eddy) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Comment (2012-09-10)
No email
send info
This Comment is provided for consideration by the ISE and author.

---

It would be helpful if the Abstract, as well as noting that the 
experiment was run in the 90s, also noted the how/why of this being a
historic record, not an on-going experiment. Stating this in terms of
the purpose of the document (as the last paragraph of Section 1) might
be a good way to do it.

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection