IETF conflict review for draft-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
(Suresh Krishnan) Yes
(Mirja Kühlewind) Yes
Deborah Brungard No Objection
Alissa Cooper No Objection
Roman Danyliw No Objection
Benjamin Kaduk No Objection
Section 10's heading is "Relation to other IETF Technologies" -- the "other" seems out of place in an ISE-stream document. I don't know (and didn't attempt to check) how consistent Appendix B.4 is with the various BCPs on HTTP/URI usage. It's interesting to see C.3, "Schemas in JSON" given that the IETF has mostly punted on JSON schemas, but perhaps this is just the market going where it needs to go.