IETF conflict review for draft-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework
conflict-review-kanugovi-intarea-mams-framework-00
Yes
(Mirja Kühlewind)
(Suresh Krishnan)
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
(Alissa Cooper)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Barry Leiba)
(Deborah Brungard)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Not sent
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Not sent
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Not sent
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Not sent
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2019-05-29)
Sent
Section 10's heading is "Relation to other IETF Technologies" -- the "other" seems out of place in an ISE-stream document. I don't know (and didn't attempt to check) how consistent Appendix B.4 is with the various BCPs on HTTP/URI usage. It's interesting to see C.3, "Schemas in JSON" given that the IETF has mostly punted on JSON schemas, but perhaps this is just the market going where it needs to go.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Not sent