IETF conflict review for draft-chz-simple-cu-separation-bng-protocol
conflict-review-chz-simple-cu-separation-bng-protocol-00
Yes
(Alvaro Retana)
(Martin Vigoureux)
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
(Adam Roach)
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Barry Leiba)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Magnus Westerlund)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Not sent
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adam Roach Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Not sent
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Not sent
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Not sent
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Not sent
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2019-12-04)
Not sent
I appreciate all the efforts of the authors/reviewers to polish the document. Though I only skimmed it, it seemed well-structured and clearly written. The security considerations section in the document seems adequate. It might be useful to have a privacy considerations section, though, to record what user/subscriber information is expected to be disclosed through which protocol flows, and what protection is available for it.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Not sent
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Not sent