IETF conflict review for draft-brandenburg-cdni-has
conflict-review-brandenburg-cdni-has-00

The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-brandenburg-cdni-has@tools.ietf.org
Cc: The IESG , , 
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-brandenburg-cdni-has-05

The IESG has completed a review of draft-brandenburg-cdni-has-05
consistent with RFC5742.


The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Models for
adaptive-streaming-aware CDN Interconnection'
as an Informational RFC.


The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
CDNI, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.

The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the
datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-brandenburg-cdni-has/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brandenburg-cdni-has/

The process for such documents is described at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

[Ballot discuss]

There's nothing in this discuss or comment that's really
for the authors or ISE, its more for Martin.

- Do the HTTPBIS and WEBSEC WGs need to take a look at this?
It seems to make some recommendations (as input to the CDNI
WG) that might touch on HTTP/2.0 or session continuation
(cookies). If told "no," I'll just clear.

[Ballot comment]

Seems like a slightly odd way of doing stuff to have this as
an ISE RFC given it appears to have been discussed in the
CDNI WG and even to have had a design team of sorts, esp
when there are also IPR declarations. (Do ISE RFCs count
as IETF contributions? I have no idea;-)

The draft draft-brandenburg-cdni-has-05
is ready for publication from the Independent Stream.
Please ask IESG to review it, as set out in RFC 5742.

The following is some background for this draft, please forward it
to IESG along with this request ...

Its abstract says ...
This documents presents thoughts on the potential impact of
supporting HTTP Adaptive Streaming technologies in CDN
Interconnection (CDNI) scenarios. The intent is to present the
authors' analysis of the CDNI-HAS problem space and discuss different
options put forward both by the authors (and by others during
informal discussions) on how to deal with HAS in the context of CDNI.
THis document has been used as input information during the WG
process for making its decision regarding support for HAS.

It was reviewed for me by Richard Woundy from Comcast; he tells me
that it was discussed in the CDNI WG, but "the purpose of the
draft is to document these WG-specific discussions relevant to HAS."

Thanks, Nevil (ISE)