Skip to main content

WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS
charter-ietf-wish-02

Yes

John Scudder
Murray Kucherawy

No Objection

Erik Kline
Jim Guichard
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke
(Andrew Alston)
(Robert Wilton)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01-00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

John Scudder
Yes
Murray Kucherawy
Yes
Erik Kline
No Objection
Francesca Palombini
No Objection
Comment (2023-12-13 for -01-00) Sent
To answer Martin Duke: reminder that yes, this wg will go to WIT (as discussed during the IESG breakfast and announced at IETF 118 - both during the plenary, tsvarea and other venues - see slides https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/118/materials/slides-118-tsvarea-wit-intro-art-wgs-00).
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Andrew Alston Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -01-00) Not sent

                            
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2023-12-14 for -01-00) Sent
# GEN AD review of charter-ietf-wish-01-00

CC @larseggert

## Comments

### "HTTPAPI", paragraph 5
```
  Dec 2024 - Submit WebRTC-HTTP egress protocol to IESG for publication
```
Add expected RFC type?

## Nits

All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there
will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
did with these suggestions.

### Grammar/style

#### "HTTPAPI", paragraph 1
```
ation (telephony, video conferencing etc), adding explicit protocol support f
                                     ^^^
```
A period is needed after the abbreviation "etc.".

## Notes

This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the
[`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into
individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT].

[ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md
[ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments
[IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool
Martin Duke Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2023-12-12 for -01-00) Sent
Looking at this charter, I wonder if it would be a good fit for WIT, as it is both HTTP-based and WebRTC related.
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -01-00) Not sent