Using TLS in Applications
charter-ietf-uta-01
Yes
(Richard Barnes)
(Sean Turner)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Stewart Bryant)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2013-11-16 for -00-01)
Unknown
Note that there's a storm in httpbis as they discuss doing this with HTTP 2.0. This charter is looking at best practices for HTTP 1.1, *not* for anything related to 2.0.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2013-11-21 for -00-02)
Unknown
YES
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2013-11-20 for -00-02)
Unknown
- I'd really like the charter to explicitly call out server-to-server unauthenticated encryption as a work item. - I'm bummed that the unauthenticated client-to-server item was softened to "consider", and would like to understand why that is necessary.
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-02)
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-02)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2013-11-17 for -00-02)
Unknown
Yes I said yes as a Mrs. Bloom once said:-)
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2013-11-21 for -00-02)
Unknown
I second Spencer's comment—I have no idea what "definitions" means in that bullet item. :) Otherwise I am enthusiastically in favor of this work being done.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-11-21 for -00-02)
Unknown
- Consider, and possibly define, a standard way for an application client and server to use unauthenticated encryption through TLS when server and/or client authentication cannot be achieved. I guess the tradeoff of unauthenticated encryption will be documented. Maybe it's so obvious that we don't need to mention that in the charter ... No strong feeling about this.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-11-20 for -00-02)
Unknown
In this text: This WG has the following tasks: - Update the definitions for using TLS over a set of representative application protocols. would it be helpful to say where these definitions are now? If they are in some RFC nnnn, perhaps it's helpful to say "updating the definitions in RFC nnnn".
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Unknown