Summary: Has enough positions to pass.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
It looks go to me and this is an important piece of work, so, go forward ! May I assume that "SUIT Status Tracker" is a well-know concept by the SUIT WG ? Minor detail: is it worthwhile to mention work at the IETF hackathon in a WG charter ? My only major concern is the last paragraph with "either the SUIT WG or the RATS WG will produce" : let's decide before re-chartering. Some nits: - should "KiB" be replaced by "kB" or "KB" ? - s/with silicon vendors and OEMs/with vendors and OEMs/ ?