Skip to main content

Software Updates for Internet of Things
charter-ietf-suit-02

Yes

Warren Kumari
(Adam Roach)
(Alia Atlas)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Ben Campbell)
(Eric Rescorla)
(Kathleen Moriarty)

No Objection

(Suresh Krishnan)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-01 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

Warren Kumari
Yes
Adam Roach Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-01) Unknown

                            
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
(was Block) Yes
Yes (2017-11-03 for -00-04) Unknown
Thank you for addressing my blocking comments.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-01) Unknown

                            
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-01) Unknown

                            
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-01) Unknown

                            
Eric Rescorla Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-01) Unknown

                            
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-01) Unknown

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2017-10-24 for -00-01) Unknown
I think s/has lead to/has led to/. English is an imperfect written language.
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2017-10-25 for -00-01) Unknown
I'm balloting No Objection but I think it would be useful to spend some more time refining the charter before sending it out for external review. 

In addition to the question raised by Erik that has already been discussed, I wonder about constraining this to ASN.1. I've seen arguments on the list for why ASN.1 makes sense, but not why the WG should be prevented from working on other formats.

I also wonder about this text being overly limiting, given that the milestones additionally include specifying an architecture: "The purpose of this group is to produce a second version of RFC 4108 that reflects the current best practices."
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2017-10-23 for -00-01) Unknown
I think it'd probably be not necessary to mention the IOTSU workshop in the final charter. And instead of naming specific drafts in the charter, I'd prefer to see milestones that respectively could mention these as starting points.
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00-01) Unknown