SIDR Operations
charter-ietf-sidrops-01
Yes
No Objection
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
No Record
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-04 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2016-10-12 for -00-04)
Unknown
I'm a Yes (this is the right thing to do), but I don't need to be the only Yes :-)
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-13 for -00-04)
Unknown
Given that the sponsoring AD hasn't balloted and none of the suggestions made during internal review were adopted or responded to, I was expecting this ballot to get deferred. I'm ok with the charter going forward but I wonder what is the point of spending time to review this twice if there is zero response to our original round of comments before we get asked to approve it.
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-13 for -00-04)
Unknown
I agree with the various comments about a final version
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-13 for -00-04)
Unknown
There were comments on the charter v3: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-sidrops/ballot/480576/ Looking at the diffs, it seems that none of them (even the editorial ones) have been considered. While there are certainly not BLOCKS, I guess this is an oversight. Note that I haven't seen any discussions on the IESG mailing list. Regards, B.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-04)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-04)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-12 for -00-04)
Unknown
Typo in #3 3. Operational olutions for identified issues should be developed in sidr-ops and documented in informational or BCP documents. s/olutions/solutions/
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-13 for -00-04)
Unknown
As Alissa said, I think there would be value in addressing our previous comments. At least the typos should be removed...
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-10-13 for -00-04)
Unknown
I agree with the comments that it'd be better to have a final charter now but am fine if that's fixed up before sending out to the community.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Record
No Record
(2016-10-13 for -00-04)
Unknown
Comments should be applied and the charter updated. Then I'll be happily in favor. Another typo: "(for example protocol maintenance clearly does not fit elsewhere in the IETF. " is missing a )