Operations and Management Area Working Group

The information below is for an older proposed charter
Document Proposed charter Operations and Management Area Working Group WG (opsawg) Snapshot
Title Operations and Management Area Working Group
Last updated 2012-09-20
State Start Chartering/Rechartering (Internal Steering Group/IAB Review) Rechartering
WG State Active
IESG Responsible AD Robert Wilton
Charter Edit AD BenoƮt Claise
Send notices to (None)


The Operations and Management Area receives occasional proposals for
  the development and publication of RFCs dealing with operational and
  management topics that are not in scope of an existing working group
  and do not justify the formation of a new working group. The OPSAWG
  will serve as the forum for developing such work items in the IETF.

  The OPSAWG mailing list is an open discussion forum for such work
  items, when they arise. The working group meets if there are active
  proposals that require discussion. The working group milestones are
  updated as needed to reflect the current work items and their
  associated milestones. All new work items and rechartering proposals
  will be brought for approval with the IESG.

  The focus of the work will be on topics that govern the behavior or WGs
  in the O&M area (e.g., manageability requirements) and on small,
  highly focused projects that don't merit a WG of their own or belong
  to WGs that have already concluded (e.g. advancement of documents on
  the standards track, application statements, extensions of MIB

  The OPSAWG will undertake only work items that are proved to have at
  least a reasonable level of interest from the operators and users
  community and have a committed number of editors and reviewers. It is
  not within the scope of the OPSAWG to pick up failed WG work or parts
  of a WG charter items that could not come to convergence on what they
  were chartered to do.

  The currently active OPSAWG work items mostly fall under the following

  (A) Development of a BCP document that will provide guidelines for
  authors and a reference for reviewers of IETF documents that specify
  new protocols or protocol extensions about the information about
  operational and manageability requirements that needs to be covered in
  these documents

  (B) Templates and tools for Operations and Management Area Documents

  (C) Maintenance and small scale extensions of documents that were
  developed in working groups that have concluded (e.g. MIB modules).

  (D) The RFC 5066 "Ethernet in the First Mile Copper (EFMCu) Interfaces
  MIB" has transitioned to the IEEE 802.3. However, as agreed with the
  IEEE, the IF-CAP- STACK-MIB MIB module (from RFC5066) is generic by nature
  and should continue to be supported by the IETF. The WG will develop a
  document extracting the IF-CAP-STACK-MIB from RFC5066, emphasizing the
  generic nature of this module, and obsolete RFC5066.

   (E) Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011.
   Considering RFC 4663 "Transferring MIB Work from IETF Bridge MIB WG to
   IEEE 802.1 WG" as an reference, the following pieces of information
   would the foundation for the document: a table mapping the old IETF MIB
   names with the corresponding new IEEE ones, clarifications/rules on the
   IETF-IEEE interactions (mailing lists, reviews), and clarifications on the
   intellectual property considerations.

Goals and Milestones
Oct 2012          Initial submission for the 'IF-CAP-STACK-MIB MIB
module' Internet-Draft Oct 2012          Initial submission for the
'RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011' Internet-Draft March  2013
    Submit the 'IF-CAP-STACK-MIB MIB module' Internet-Draft to the IESG
for consideration as Proposed Standard March  2013     Submit the 'RFCs
transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011' Internet-Draft to the IESG for
consideration as Informational