Ballot for charter-ietf-lamps
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
This looks fine AFAICT, although I share Ben’s misgivings about the milestones.
Do we need to expand or qualify (US) NIST? If I read this properly, for 5.a we have to wait for NIST (since we will use their OIDs), but for 5.b we could in theory go faster, if CFRG produces something sooner. But for 5.b we still have to wait for at least one of NIST and CFRG, right? The proposed milestones put a lot of work in September; is that achievable?