Geographic JSON

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-02 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

(Ben Campbell) Yes

Alissa Cooper Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Comment (2015-09-30 for -00-02)
No email
send info
Very consistent feedback with my previous review:

One readability improvement.
So many RFC numbers I have to lookup, in this charter: 5870, 7464, 3693,
6280. Sorry I don't know them all by heart.
A good convention is name + RFC, such as "JavaScript Object Notation
(JSON) [RFC7159]"

I guess it's a short-lived WG, right? Two deliverables and then closed,
Would be worth mentioning IMO. In the milestones, that would be fine.

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection