Forwarding and Control Element Separation

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03-07 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

(Adrian Farrel) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Richard Barnes) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

Comment (2013-05-08 for -03-07)
No email
send info
"1. Allow complex metadata"

A plate of spaghetti is a complex. Hopefully you mean "compound" or "structured"?.

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

Comment (2013-05-15 for -03-08)
No email
send info
My apologies for not noticing this previously, and if it's been discussed, I didn't see it in the tracker ...

In this text:

In addition to the specific work items listed above, the working group will
allow discussions and review work of how to use ForCES to model topics of
interest to Network Function Virtualization, I2RS, or OpenFlow.

is "or OpenFlow" too specific? One answer could be "no" ...

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Barry Leiba) No Objection

(Ted Lemon) No Objection

Comment (2013-05-12 for -03-08)
No email
send info
Inter-FE connectivity: s/Logigal/Logical/

The charter is nice and tight.

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection