Distributed Mobility Management
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01-01 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
(Brian Haberman) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Alia Atlas) No Objection
(Richard Barnes) No Objection
(Benoît Claise) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) No Objection
Comment (2014-10-15 for -01-01)
Pete's rephrasing would equally address my Comment from the first round.
(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection
Barry Leiba No Objection
(Ted Lemon) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection
(Pete Resnick) No Objection
Comment (2014-10-14 for -01-01)
The working group will produce both informational architectural and standards track protocol solutions on the following work item topics. I know this was in response to Adrian's comment, but I really don't like specifying in charters that the WG to do particular numbers or statuses of documents. I would prefer: The working group will produce one or more documents on the following work item topics.