Skip to main content

DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities
charter-ietf-dane-02

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
02 (System) Notify list changed from ogud@ogud.com, warren@kumari.net to (None)
2014-06-13
02 Cindy Morgan New version available: charter-ietf-dane-02.txt
2014-06-13
01-07 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved from IESG review
2014-06-13
01-07 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the charter
2014-06-13
01-07 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2014-06-13
01-07 Cindy Morgan Closed "Ready for external review" ballot
2014-06-13
01-07 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2014-06-13
01-07 Cindy Morgan New version to fix line breaks plus one typo.
2014-06-13
01-07 Cindy Morgan New version available: charter-ietf-dane-01-07.txt
2014-06-13
01-06 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2014-06-13
01-06 Stephen Farrell New version available: charter-ietf-dane-01-06.txt
2014-06-13
01-05 Stephen Farrell New version available: charter-ietf-dane-01-05.txt
2014-06-13
01-04 Stephen Farrell New version available: charter-ietf-dane-01-04.txt
2014-06-12
01-03 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Leftover bits:

OLD
    The WG will specify such mechanisms for
    SMTP, SMIME, OPENPGP, and IPSEC.
NEW
    The …
[Ballot comment]
Leftover bits:

OLD
    The WG will specify such mechanisms for
    SMTP, SMIME, OPENPGP, and IPSEC.
NEW
    The WG will specify the use of DANE for protocols that use SRV to
    express service location. The WG will specify DANE use for SMTP,
    SMIME, OPENPGP, IPSEC and and other base electronic mail protocols
    such as (IMAP or POP)
END

Possible addition:
as well as any other protocol that does not have a working group.


OLD
    The DANE working group will also assist other working
    groups with adding DANE functionality to their work. When work on
    the work items enumerated above is complete, the WG may
    re-charter if sufficiently pressing new work is identified.
NEW
END

(The first sentence above was supposed to be deleted. The second sentence appears twice; some cut/paste error.)

And while you're at it, re-wrap the first paragraph.
2014-06-12
01-03 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2014-06-12
01-03 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2014-06-12
01-03 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2014-06-12
01-03 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2014-06-12
01-03 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2014-06-12
01-03 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2014-06-12
01-03 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2014-06-12
01-03 Ted Lemon [Ballot comment]
It would be nice if you could fix the formatting at the top, but aside from that I have no objection.
2014-06-12
01-03 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2014-06-12
01-03 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2014-06-12
01-03 Stephen Farrell New version available: charter-ietf-dane-01-03.txt
2014-06-12
01-02 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2014-06-12
01-02 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2014-06-12
01-02 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

Oops. I changed this to IESG review since I hope we just approve it today, but
that reset the ballot. (I think I …
[Ballot comment]

Oops. I changed this to IESG review since I hope we just approve it today, but
that reset the ballot. (I think I only have Pete's comment to handle and will do
that but let me know if I'm skipping something)

Apologies.
2014-06-12
01-02 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2014-06-12
01-02 Stephen Farrell Created "Approve" ballot
2014-06-12
01-02 Stephen Farrell State changed to IESG review from Internal review
2014-06-11
01-02 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2014-06-10
01-02 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2014-06-10
01-02 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
I thought we were skipping external review? Is the ballot just wrong?

Not quite worth a block, but I do think these changes …
[Ballot comment]
I thought we were skipping external review? Is the ballot just wrong?

Not quite worth a block, but I do think these changes should be made:

    The DANE WG will process documents that describe how to
    incorporate DANE and DANE-like functionality in protocols, and
    mechanisms to facilitate adoption of this functionality.
 
Instead: "The DANE WG will specify how to incorporate DANE and DANE-like functionality into protocols." Also, specify the list (given that below it says no new items without rechartering): "The WG will specify such mechanisms for SMTP, SMIME, OPENPGP, and IPSEC." (It's not clear to me if the SRV document fits in this category.)
   
    The DANE
    working group will also assist other working groups with adding
    DANE functionality to their work.
   
How does that differ from the above?
   
    In addition the working group
    will monitor and provide guidance to operators and tool developers.
   
Strike that, or make it something the WG can actually accomplish like, "The DANE WG shall also produce a set of implementation guidance for operators and tool developers."
   
    When work on currently chartered documents is complete the WG
    may re-charter if sufficiently pressing new work is identified.

Instead: "When work on the work items enumerated above is complete, the WG may re-charter if sufficiently pressing new work is identified."   

    DANE is not intended to be a long-lived catch-all WG
    for all PKI in DNS issues and so will generally not adopt new
    work items without re-chartering.

Peachy. And the Problem Statement is fine; it's just descriptive, AFAICT.
2014-06-10
01-02 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2014-06-09
01-02 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2014-06-09
01-02 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2014-06-05
01-02 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2014-06-05
01-02 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2014-06-05
01-02 Stephen Farrell New version available: charter-ietf-dane-01-02.txt
2014-06-05
01-01 Stephen Farrell New version available: charter-ietf-dane-01-01.txt
2014-06-04
01-00 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
These issues are nits. I'd love for them to be fixed, but they are not so important...

Although those skilled in the art …
[Ballot comment]
These issues are nits. I'd love for them to be fixed, but they are not so important...

Although those skilled in the art may know what "DANE and DANE-like
functionality" is, I think the charter would do well to set this out
in the first sentence such as:
  DANE is a set of mechanisms and techniques that allow Internet
  applications to establish cryptographically secured communications
  by using information distributed through DNSSEC for discovering
  and authenticating public keys which are associated with a service
  located at a domain name.

There are three instances of "The group may..." (the last three
paragraphs.  I understand the desire to encourage the WG to do
things and to be clear that doing them is not out of scope, but I
wish that there was a stronger directive to do stuff or that it
was simply left off the charter.
2014-06-04
01-00 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2014-05-29
01-00 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2014-05-28
01-00 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2014-05-22
01-00 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Editorial (bad grammar, and very hard to read):

OLD
    DANE supports both Certificates and raw
    keys, further more Certificates …
[Ballot comment]
Editorial (bad grammar, and very hard to read):

OLD
    DANE supports both Certificates and raw
    keys, further more Certificates and raw keys can be either the full
    key or a hash of the key.

NEW
    DANE supports both certificates and raw
    keys.  Furthermore, the keys (raw, or imbedded in certificates) can
    be full keys or hashes of keys.

END

Though, really, I think the sentence could just as well be removed as fixed.
2014-05-22
01-00 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell WG action text was changed
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell WG review text was changed
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Created "Ready for external review" ballot
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Added charter milestone "Recharter or close down", due November 2015
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Added charter milestone "Advance DANE RFC6698 and DANE SRV RFC to Internet Standard", due September 2015
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Added charter milestone "Advance DANE reverse binding (server to client) document to IESG", due June 2015
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Added charter milestone "Advance DANE IPSEC document to IESG", due May 2015
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Added charter milestone "Advance DANE security model document to IESG", due January 2015
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Added charter milestone "Advance DANE operational guidance/errata document to IESG", due September 2014
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Added charter milestone "Advance DANE OPENPGP document to IESG", due August 2014
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Added charter milestone "Advance DANE SMIME document to IESG", due August 2014
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Added charter milestone "Advance DANE SMTP document to IESG", due June 2014
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Added charter milestone "Advance DANE SRV document to IESG", due June 2014
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Notification list changed to ogud@ogud.com, warren@kumari.net
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Responsible AD changed to Stephen Farrell
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell Placed on agenda for telechat - 2014-06-12
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell
Suggest this doesn't need external review.
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell State changed to Informal IESG review from Approved
2014-05-20
01-00 Stephen Farrell New version available: charter-ietf-dane-01-00.txt
2010-12-10
01 (System) New version available: charter-ietf-dane-01.txt