Calendaring Extensions
charter-ietf-calext-02
Yes
(Alissa Cooper)
(Barry Leiba)
(Pete Resnick)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Richard Barnes)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Ted Lemon)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-02 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-03)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-02)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-03)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-08-19 for -00-02)
Unknown
No objection, but... > out of scope for the working group: > > - Any change that significantly impacts backwards compatibility with > existing deployed iCalendar/iTIP/CalDAV clients and servers. I wonder whether what you consider as significant is the same as what I would call significant.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Unknown
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-08-18 for -00-02)
Unknown
This all looks fine. One question for my benefit. "- Define a set of new iCalendar properties and parameters to standardise some existing experimental X- properties in common use, based on a survey of existing implementations." I wasn't quite sure whether this meant standardizing an "X-Foo" experimental property, or standardizing a renamed "Foo:". It's unlikely that needs to be stated in a charter, either way, but just in case it does ... if the deliverable was "standardise some existing experimental properties", I wouldn't have thought to ask, but given the existence of http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648, I wondered.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Unknown
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Unknown