Liaison statement
Liaison Response from MEF on IP Services

State Posted
Posted Date 2016-05-06
From Group MEF
From Contact MEF Liaison
To Groups ippm, l3sm, mpls, OPS
To Contacts Adrian Farrel
Benoit Claise
CcAlvaro Retana
Joel Jaeggli
Deborah Brungard
IP Performance Metrics Discussion List
Multiprotocol Label Switching Discussion List
Adrian Farrel
Ross Callon
Bill Cerveny
Brian Trammell
Spencer Dawkins
George Swallow
Alia Atlas
Mirja Kühlewind
The IETF Chair
L3VPN Service Model Discussion List
Loa Andersson
Benoit Claise
Qin Wu
Raghu Ranganathan
Response Contact rraghu@ciena.com
Purpose In response
Attachments Liaison Response from MEF on IP Services
Liaisons referred by this one Response to Liaison Statement on IP Service Attributes 2016-02-26
Body
We would like to thank you for your liaison of 14th April 2016. As you
requested, we have encouraged MEF members to submit any feedback they have on
the L3SM draft directly to the L3SM working group.

We would like to clarify that the scope of the current MEF project is to
develop Service Attribute definitions; it is not in the scope of the current
project to create a Yang module. However, the IP Service Attributes project has
been studying the L3SM draft to ensure that our attribute definitions are
aligned with it as much as possible. It is hoped that this will enable a future
MEF project that develops a Yang model to define it as an extension of the L3SM
model, as you suggest.

The next MEF meetings are:
   August 1-4, 2016 – Boston, USA
   October 24-27, 2016 - Ottawa, Canada