Liaison statement
Liaison to IETF on YANG Service OAM models
Additional information about IETF liaison relationships is available on the
IETF webpage
and the
Internet Architecture Board liaison webpage.
State | Posted |
---|---|
Submitted Date | 2014-07-31 |
From Group | MEF |
From Contact | Mike Bencheck |
To Group | netmod |
To Contacts | Jürgen Schönwälder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Tom Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> |
Cc | Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Nan Chen <nan@metroethernetforum.org> Bill Bjorkman <bill@metroethernetforum.net> Raghu Ranganathan <rraghu@ciena.com> kevin@metroethernetforum.org netmod@ietf.org tsbsg15@itu.int glenn.parsons@ericsson.com tnadeau@lucidvision.com |
Response Contact | nan@metroethernetforum.org rraghu@ciena.com |
Purpose | For information |
Attachments | Liaison to IETF on YANG Service OAM models |
Body |
Dear Jürgen Schönwälder, Tom Nadeau, and Benoit Claise: The MEF wants to communicate to the IETF NETCONF Data Modeling Language (netmod) Working Group that MEF has existing YANG Service OAM Fault Monitoring (MEF 38) and Service OAM Performance Monitoring (MEF 39) specifications. MEF 38 and MEF 39 are published specifications and can be found on the MEF public website at: http://www.metroethernetforum.org/Assets/Technical_Specifications/PDF/MEF_38.pdf http://www.metroethernetforum.org/Assets/Technical_Specifications/PDF/MEF_39.pdf There appears to be some direct overlap with these specifications and the goals of the Working Group, specifically in the area of MD, MA (MEG) and MEP definitions as found in http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-netmod-oam/. We request that IETF review and consider using these models, if applicable. We look forward to feedback from you on this subject. The MEF Technical Committee meets next in Atlanta in October 27-29, 2014. |