todd glassey and michael mcneil 's Statement about IPR related to RFC 5905, RFC 5906, and There are a number of other infringing Timing Service Protocols which directly infringe on the Teachings of US6370629 and the copyright controlled extensions ther...
Note: Updates to IPR disclosures must only be made by authorized representatives of the original submitters. Updates will automatically be forwarded to the current Patent Holder's Contact and to the Submitter of the original IPR disclosure.
I. Patent Holder/Applicant ("Patent Holder")
- Holder legal name
- todd glassey and michael mcneil
II. Patent Holder's Contact for License Application
- Holder contact name
- todd glassey
- Holder contact email
- Holder contact info
The US6370629 Patent and the Geospatial Keying System which is copyright controlled and is the sole property of the PRA/Glassey/McNeil is infringed on by this draft 5905 in the design of the Location Based Service aspects of NTP and its new Cryptographic Extensions.
The US Patent was issued properly but for some funny reason the Settlement which we allege was extorted under Economic Duress doesnt mention that there was at the time of its execution SIX instances of US6370629, the American one of course, an Australian Instance called 54015/99, a South African one (ZA9906799A), a Brazilian one (BR9904979A), a Canadian one (CA2287596A1) and the EU Filing (EP0997808A3).
The Settlement ONLY TALKS ABOUT THE US PATENT AND DOES NOT DISCLOSE THE EXISTENCE OF THE OTHER FIVE INSTANCES. NO AUTHORIZATION TO FILE ANY OF THEM AT THE TIME THEY WERE FILED WAS PROVIDED. THE ONLY ONE WITH A RELEASE WAS THE ZA INSTANCE AND IT WAS DEMANDED AND SUPPLIED 6 MONTHS AFTER THE FILING, BUT IN ALL INSTANCES THE FILING WAS DENIED SAYING THAT THERE WERE NO FOREIGN PATENTS FILED AT THE TIME OF THE SETTLEMENTS EXECUTION. Something clearly untrue based on evidence available today. That means under California Law the Settlement is functionally voide meaning that your corporations as Public Entities are not licensed to use this IP without payment for it.
Have a nice day...
III. Contact Information for the IETF Participant Whose Personal Belief Triggered this Disclosure
- Todd Glassey
- Other info
IV. IETF Document or Other Contribution to Which this IPR Disclosure Relates
RFC5905 ("Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification")
RFC5906 ("Network Time Protocol Version 4: Autokey Specification")
- Designations for Other Contributions
- There are a number of other infringing Timing Service Protocols which directly infringe on the Teachings of US6370629 and the copyright controlled extensions therein.
V. Disclosure of Patent Information i.e., patents or patent applications required to be disclosed by RFC 3979 as updated by RFC 4879
A. For granted patents or published pending patent applications, please provide the following information:
- Patent, Serial, Publication, Registration, or Application/File number(s)
US6370629 - as itself and as the Copyright Controlled GKS extensions to the Service Protocols used in managing secure-time delivery.
See also -
South African ZA9906799A
EU Filing EP0997808A3
Korean Filing KO20000035093A
Japan Filing JP2000-163379
B. Does this disclosure relate to an unpublished pending patent application?:
- Has patent pending
VI. Licensing Declaration
The Patent Holder states that its position with respect to licensing any patent claims contained in the patent(s) or patent application(s) disclosed above that would necessarily be infringed by implementation of the technology required by the relevant IETF specification ("Necessary Patent Claims"), for the purpose of implementing such specification, is as follows(select one licensing declaration option only):
- See Text Below for Licensing Declaration
- Licensing information, comments, notes, or URL for further information
Licensing is available for NTP Servers running 'secured time services' across private and public networks under this set of controls. The Copyright attached to the GSK extensions of the US6370629 is included with each licensing agreement. The Licensing Fee is based on a USE MODEL CHARGE which is computed at 1/5th the PER EVENT CHARGE that the NYSE uses in their Licensing Models; that being 5 (five) mils (5 1000th's of a cent) per transactional TIMESTAMP instance.
Licensing is available directly or through Counsel; and all parties using the new secured NTP services post-v4 are noticed that their implementations infringe as well.
Have a nice day and feel free to contact us.
Note: The individual submitting this template represents and warrants that he or she is authorized by the Patent Holder to agree to the above-selected licensing declaration.
VII. Contact Information of Submitter of this Form
- Submitter name
- todd glassey
- Submitter email
VIII. Other Notes
- Additional notes
Be aware that use of protocol which is unlicensed in this matter constitutes a Fraud Loss based on these clearly unlicensed and unauthorized instances of US6370629 which were not disclosed or covered in the specious Release that IETF is using to 'protect its own use and its cross licensing of IP containing this IP' or so we allege in Court.
Again, Have a nice day.
Only those sections of the relevant entry form where the submitter provided information are displayed.