Skip to main content

Link State Routing (lsr)

Group history

Date By Action
2024-03-20 Cindy Morgan Area Director changed to Gunter Van de Velde from John Scudder
2024-02-23 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-119
2023-12-21 Acee Lindem Delegate changed to from Jeff Tantsura
2023-11-09 John Scudder Secretary changed to from Yingzhen Qu
2023-11-09 John Scudder Chair changed to Acee Lindem, Christian Hopps, Yingzhen Qu from Acee Lindem, Christian Hopps
2023-10-13 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-118
2023-06-30 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-117
2023-03-03 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-116
2022-10-14 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-115
2022-07-01 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-114
2022-05-03 Amy K. Vezza
Resources changed to tracker https://trac.ietf.org/trac/lsr/report/1 (Issue tracker), webpage https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/lsr/about/status (Current WG Status), webpage https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/isis/documents/ (ISIS WG's Documents and RFCs), webpage https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ospf/documents/ (OSPF WG's Documents and …
Resources changed to tracker https://trac.ietf.org/trac/lsr/report/1 (Issue tracker), webpage https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/lsr/about/status (Current WG Status), webpage https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/isis/documents/ (ISIS WG's Documents and RFCs), webpage https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ospf/documents/ (OSPF WG's Documents and RFCs), wiki https://trac.ietf.org/trac/lsr/wiki (Wiki), zulip https://zulip.ietf.org/#narrow/stream/75-lsr (Zulip Stream) from tracker https://trac.ietf.org/trac/lsr/report/1 (Issue tracker), webpage https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/lsr/about/status (Current WG Status), webpage https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/isis/documents/ (ISIS WG's Documents and RFCs), webpage https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ospf/documents/ (OSPF WG's Documents and RFCs), wiki https://trac.ietf.org/trac/lsr/wiki (Wiki)
2022-03-17 John Scudder Delegate changed to Jeff Tantsura from
2022-02-25 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-113
2021-10-15 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-112
2021-07-02 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-111
2021-03-10 Cindy Morgan Area Director changed to John Scudder from Alvaro Retana
2021-02-12 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-110
2020-10-23 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-109
2020-07-02 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-108
2020-02-28 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-107
2019-10-25 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-106
2019-06-28 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-105
2019-03-24 Acee Lindem
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state …
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state interior gateway routing protocols (IGPs) - specifically IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3. The LSR Working Group was formed by merging the ISIS and OSPF WGs and assigning all their existing adopted work at the time of chartering to LSR.

Current areas of interest in the LSR WG include:

* Segment Routing Extensions: The IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3 extensions for the MPLS data plane are either on the RFC queue or in the final review cycle.

  - OSPF Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions/
  - IS-IS Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions/
  - OSPFv3 Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions/
  - Segment Routing in the MPLS Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls/


* Segment Routing Extensions based for IPv6 are being developed.

  - IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions/

* YANG Modeling: The base OSPF YANG Model has completed WG last call and is ready for publication request. The base IS-IS model will follow shortly. We have various model drafts for extensions that can be progressed now that the base models are nearly publication. The relevant YANG model drafts include:

* The following YANG models are awating AD Review:   

    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg/

*  The following are being developed.

    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang/
    - YANG Model for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/

* Computation Optimizations: There are both WG documents and individual proposals to improve the LSR route computation. These include:

    - IGP Flexible Algorithm - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/
    - OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te/

* Link Attribute Advertisement: OSPF and ISIS will allow application specific link attributes. These drafts will be WG last called shortly after IETF 104.

    - IS-IS TE App - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-te-app/
    - OSPF Link Traffic Engineering (TE) Attribute Reuse - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse/

* Data Center (DC) Routing Optimizations - We have adopted the base dynamic flooding draft. This draft doesn't specify the algorithm and work on algorithms can now proceed in separate drafts.

* The following are WG documents with updates at Prague:

    - IS-IS Spine Leaf - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-spine-leaf-ext
    - Dynamic flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding

At IETF 104, there will be updates on existing WG documents as well as presentations on following new work:

    - IS-IS Invalid TLV - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv
    - Update to IS-IS SRv6 - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions
    - OSPFv3 BIER Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-psenak-bier-ospfv3-extensions/
    - OSPF Admin Tags - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospf-admin-tags
    - OSPF Reverse Metric - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric
    - OSPF BFD Strict Mode - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode
    - Updates to Flooding Reduction - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction/
    - OSPFv3 Extended LSA YANG Model - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/
    - Hierarchial IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-hierarchical-isis/
    - IS-IS Area Abstraction - https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-li-lsr-isis-area-abstraction-00.txt

Document Status:

  * Since the last IETF in Bangkok, the following RFC have been published:

    - RFC 8444 - OSPFv2 Extensions for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) – BIER WG Document
    - RFC 8476 – Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD) using OSPF
    - RFC 8491 – Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSG) using ISIS
    - RFC 8500 – IS-IS with Reverse Metric
    - RFC 8510 - OSPF Link-Local Signaling (LLS) Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement
    - RFC 8570RFC 7810 Correction of IS-IS TE Metric Extensions encoding

  * The following drafts are on the RFC Queue waiting for missed references:

    - Advertising L2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in IS-IS -  draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07.txt– Waiting on ISIS SR Extensions.
    - The Tunnel Encapsulations OSPF Router Information draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-09 – Waiting on IDR Tunnel Encap Draft (To be presented in IDR)
    - OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-27 - Waiting on “Segment Routing with MPLS Data Plane” and “Segment Routing InterOp with LDP"
    -  OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing  - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-23 – Also waiting on same drafts.

  * The following drafts are in the AD review process:

    - H-bit Support for OSPFv2 draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-06 – Waiting on authors for revised update for simple comments for over 100 days!
    - IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-22 – Comments recently provided and revised ID required
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol - draft-ietf-ospf-yang-21 – Waiting on AD Review
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol - draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-35 – Waiting on AD Review
    - OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-05 – Publication just requested.

  * The following drafts are in WG last call:

    - Restart Signaling for IS-IS - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-01

  * The following drafts will be WG last called soon:

    - IS-IS TE Attributes per application - draft-ietf-isis-te-app-05.txt
    - OSPF Link Traffic Engineering (TE) Attribute Reuse - draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-06.txt

  * The following are new WG documents:

    - Dynamic Flooding on Dense Graphs - draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-00
    - IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-spine-leaf-ext-01
    - OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator - draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-00
    - IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-00

  * The following are existing WG documents:

    - Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using - IS-IS draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-06 - Authors need to bring forward
    - Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-07 - Authors need to bring forward
    - IGP Flexible Algorithm draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-01.txt - Work on implementations in progress
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF SR (Segment Routing) Protocol draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-07 - To be progressed now that base YANG documents are with AD
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Segment Routing draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang-05 - To be progressed now that base YANG documents are with AD

Date: March 24th, 2019
       

     





2019-03-24 Acee Lindem
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state …
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state interior gateway routing protocols (IGPs) - specifically IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3. The LSR Working Group was formed by merging the ISIS and OSPF WGs and assigning all their existing adopted work at the time of chartering to LSR.

Current areas of interest in the LSR WG include:

* Segment Routing Extensions: The IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3 extensions for the MPLS data plane are either on the RFC queue or in the final review cycle.

  - OSPF Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions/
  - IS-IS Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions/
  - OSPFv3 Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions/
  - Segment Routing in the MPLS Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls/


* Segment Routing Extensions based for IPv6 are being developed.

  - IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions/

* YANG Modeling: The base OSPF YANG Model has completed WG last call and is ready for publication request. The base IS-IS model will follow shortly. We have various model drafts for extensions that can be progressed now that the base models are nearly publication. The relevant YANG model drafts include:

* The following YANG models are awating AD Review:   

    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg/

*  The following are being developed.

    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang/
    - YANG Model for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/

* Computation Optimizations: There are both WG documents and individual proposals to improve the LSR route computation. These include:

    - IGP Flexible Algorithm - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/
    - OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te/

* Link Attribute Advertisement: OSPF and ISIS will allow application specific link attributes. These drafts will be WG last called shortly after IETF 104.

    - IS-IS TE App - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-te-app/
    - OSPF Link Traffic Engineering (TE) Attribute Reuse - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse/

* Data Center (DC) Routing Optimizations - We have adopted the base dynamic flooding draft. This draft doesn't specify the algorithm and work on algorithms can now proceed in separate drafts.

* The following are WG documents with updates at Prague:

    - IS-IS Spine Leaf - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-spine-leaf-ext
    - Dynamic flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding

At IETF 104, there will be updates on existing WG documents as well as presentations on following new work:

    - IS-IS Invalid TLV - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv
    - Update to IS-IS SRv6 - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions
    - OSPFv3 BIER Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-psenak-bier-ospfv3-extensions/
    - OSPF Admin Tags - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospf-admin-tags
    - OSPF Reverse Metric - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric
    - OSPF BFD Strict Mode - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode
    - Updates to Flooding Reduction - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction/
    - OSPFv3 Extended LSA YANG Model - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/
    - Hierarchial IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-hierarchical-isis/
    - IS-IS Area Abstraction - https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-li-lsr-isis-area-abstraction-00.txt

Document Status:

  Since the last IETF in Bangkok, the following RFC have been published:

    - RFC 8444 - OSPFv2 Extensions for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) – BIER WG Document
    - RFC 8476 – Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD) using OSPF
    - RFC 8491 – Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSG) using ISIS
    - RFC 8500 – IS-IS with Reverse Metric
    - RFC 8510 - OSPF Link-Local Signaling (LLS) Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement
    - RFC 8570RFC 7810 Correction of IS-IS TE Metric Extensions encoding

  The following drafts are on the RFC Queue waiting for missed references:

    - Advertising L2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in IS-IS -  draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07.txt– Waiting on ISIS SR Extensions.
    - The Tunnel Encapsulations OSPF Router Information draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-09 – Waiting on IDR Tunnel Encap Draft (To be presented in IDR)
    - OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-27 - Waiting on “Segment Routing with MPLS Data Plane” and “Segment Routing InterOp with LDP"
    -  OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing  - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-23 – Also waiting on same drafts.

  The following drafts are in the AD review process:

    - H-bit Support for OSPFv2 draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-06 – Waiting on authors for revised update for simple comments for over 100 days!
    - IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-22 – Comments recently provided and revised ID required
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol - draft-ietf-ospf-yang-21 – Waiting on AD Review
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol - draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-35 – Waiting on AD Review
    - OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-05 – Publication just requested.

  The following drafts are in WG last call:

    - Restart Signaling for IS-IS - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-01

  The following drafts will be WG last called soon:

    - IS-IS TE Attributes per application - draft-ietf-isis-te-app-05.txt
    - OSPF Link Traffic Engineering (TE) Attribute Reuse - draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-06.txt

  The following are new WG documents:

    - Dynamic Flooding on Dense Graphs - draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-00
    - IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-spine-leaf-ext-01
    - OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator - draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-00
    - IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-00

  The following are existing WG documents:
    - Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using - IS-IS draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-06 - Authors need to bring forward
    - Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-07 - Authors need to bring forward
    - IGP Flexible Algorithm draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-01.txt - Work on implementations in progress
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF SR (Segment Routing) Protocol draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-07 - To be progressed now that base YANG documents are with AD
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Segment Routing draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang-05 - To be progressed now that base YANG documents are with AD

Date: March 24th, 2019
       

     





2019-03-01 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-104
2018-11-04 Acee Lindem
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state …
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state interior gateway routing protocols (IGPs) - specifically IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3. The LSR Working Group was formed by merging the ISIS and OSPF WGs and assigning all their existing adopted work at the time of chartering to LSR.

Current areas of interest in the LSR WG include:

* Segment Routing Extensions: The IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3 extensions for the MPLS data plane are all nearly completion. The are all dependent on a normative reference to the "Segment Routing in the MPLS Data Plane" draft. Extensions for Segment Routing on the IPv6 data plane are under way. The salient LSR Segment Routing drafts are:

  - OSPF Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions/
  - IS-IS Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions/
  - OSPFv3 Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions/
  - Segment Routing in the MPLS Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls/
  - IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions/

* YANG Modeling: The base OSPF YANG Model has completed WG last call and is ready for publication request. The base IS-IS model will follow shortly. We have various model drafts for extensions that can be progressed now that the base models are nearly publication. The relevant YANG model drafts include:
   
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg/
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang/
    - YANG Model for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/

* Computation Optimizations: There are both WG documents and individual proposals to improve the LSR route computation. These include:

    - IGP Flexible Algorithm - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/
    - OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te/
    - Preferred Path Routing (PPR) in IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-preferred-path-routing/
    - Preferred Path Routing (PPR) in OSPF - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chunduri-lsr-ospf-preferred-path-routing/
    - Preferred Path Route Graph Structure - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ce-lsr-ppr-graph/
 
* Link Attribute Advertisement: OSPF and ISIS will allow application specific link attributes.

    - IS-IS TE App - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-te-app/
    - OSPF Link Traffic Engineering (TE) Attribute Reuse - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse/

* Data Center (DC) Routing Optimizations: We have multiple proposals to reduce the flooding overhead in densely meshed data center topologies. Many of these will be presented at IETF 103 in Bangkok. A list of drafts in this area is included below:

    - IS-IS Spine Leaf - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext
    - Dynamic flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding
    - IS-IS Sparse Link-State Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hsmit-lsr-isis-dnfm
    - OSPF Flooding Reduction - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction
    - Distributed Algorithm for Constrained IGP Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-allan-lsr-flooding-algorithm-00
    - IS-IS Support for Openfabric - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-openfabric/

  While there is much differentiation in these proposals there is also a significant amount of overlap. This is an area of WG debate and there may be in interim on the topic.

At IETF 103, there will also be some key presentations relating to IS-IS protocol enhancements. These have been talked about in the past but no formal proposals have gone forward. These could be the start of some exciting new protocol enhancements:

    - IS-IS over TCP - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hsmit-lsr-isis-flooding-over-tcp/
    - Level 1 IS-IS Area Abstraction - https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-li-area-abstraction-00.txt/
    - Hierarchial IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-hierarchical-isis/

Document Status:

  Since the last IETF in Montreal, there have not been in RFC published. However, the following drafts have have completed IESG review since Montreal and will be published "soon":

      - Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/
      - Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd/
      - OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id/
 
The following draft is currently in the IESG Evaluation process:

      - IS-IS Routing with Reverse Metric  - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric/

The following draft is in IETF last call:

        - OSPFv3 Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions/

  Publication has been requested for the following drat:

        - H-bit Support for OSPFv2 - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit/


Date: November 1st, 2018
       

     





2018-11-01 Acee Lindem
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state …
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state interior gateway routing protocols (IGPs) - specifically IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3. The LSR Working Group was formed by merging the ISIS and OSPF WGs and assigning all their existing adopted work at the time of chartering to LSR.

Current areas of interest in the LSR WG include:

* Segment Routing Extensions: The IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3 extensions for the MPLS data plane are all nearly completion. The are all dependent on a normative reference to the "Segment Routing in the MPLS Data Plane" draft. Extensions for Segment Routing on the IPv6 data plane are under way. The salient LSR Segment Routing drafts are:

  - OSPF Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions/
  - IS-IS Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions/
  - OSPFv3 Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions/
  - Segment Routing in the MPLS Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls/
  - IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions/

* YANG Modeling: The base OSPF YANG Model has completed WG last call and is ready for publication request. The base IS-IS model will follow shortly. We have various model drafts for extensions that can be progressed now that the base models are nearly publication. The relevant YANG model drafts include:
   
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg/
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang/
    - YANG Model for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/

* Computation Optimizations: There are both WG documents and individual proposals to improve the LSR route computation. These include:

    - IGP Flexible Algorithm - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/
    - OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te/
    - Preferred Path Routing (PPR) in IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chunduri-lsr-isis-preferred-path-routing/
    - Preferred Path Route Graph Structure - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ce-lsr-ppr-graph/
 
* Link Attribute Advertisement: OSPF and ISIS will allow application specific link attributes.

    - IS-IS TE App - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-te-app/
    - OSPF Link Traffic Engineering (TE) Attribute Reuse - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse/

* Data Center (DC) Routing Optimizations: We have multiple proposals to reduce the flooding overhead in densely meshed data center topologies. Many of these will be presented at IETF 103 in Bangkok. A list of drafts in this area is included below:

    - IS-IS Spine Leaf - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext
    - Dynamic flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding
    - IS-IS Sparse Link-State Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hsmit-lsr-isis-dnfm
    - OSPF Flooding Reduction - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction
    - Distributed Algorithm for Constrained IGP Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-allan-lsr-flooding-algorithm-00
    - IS-IS Support for Openfabric - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-openfabric/

  While there is much differentiation in these proposals there is also a significant amount of overlap. This is an area of WG debate and there may be in interim on the topic.

At IETF 103, there will also be some key presentations relating to IS-IS protocol enhancements. These have been talked about in the past but no formal proposals have gone forward. These could be the start of some exciting new protocol enhancements:

    - IS-IS over TCP - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hsmit-lsr-isis-flooding-over-tcp/
    - Level 1 IS-IS Area Abstraction - https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-li-area-abstraction-00.txt/
    - Hierarchial IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-hierarchical-isis/

Document Status:

  Since the last IETF in Montreal, there have not been in RFC published. However, the following drafts have have completed IESG review since Montreal and will be published "soon":

      - Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/
      - Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd/
      - OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id/
 
The following draft is currently in the IESG Evaluation process:

      - IS-IS Routing with Reverse Metric  - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric/

The following draft is in IETF last call:

        - OSPFv3 Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions/

  Publication has been requested for the following drat:

        - H-bit Support for OSPFv2 - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit/


Date: November 1st, 2018
       

     





2018-11-01 Acee Lindem
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state …
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state interior gateway routing protocols (IGPs) - specifically IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3. The LSR Working Group was formed by merging the isis and ospf WGs and assigning all their existing adopted work at the time of chartering to LSR.

Current areas of interest in the LSR WG include:

* Segment Routing Extensions: The IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3 extensions for the MPLS data plane are all nearly completion. The are all dependent on a normative reference to the "Segment Routing in the MPLS Data Plane" draft. Extensions for Segment Routing on the IPv6 data plane are under way. The salient LSR Segment Routing drafts are:

  - OSPF Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions/
  - IS-IS Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions/
  - OSPFv3 Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions/
  - Segment Routing in the MPLS Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls/
  - IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions/

* YANG Modeling: The base OSPF YANG Model has completed WG last call and is ready for publication request. The base IS-IS model will follow shortly. We have various model drafts for extensions that can be progressed now that the base models are nearly publication. The relevant YANG model drafts include:
   
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg/
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang/
    - YANG Model for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/

* Data Center (DC) Routing Optimizations: We have multiple proposals to reduce the flooding overhead in densely meshed data center topologies. Many of these will be presented at IETF 103 in Bangkok. A list of drafts in this area is included below:

    - IS-IS Spine Leaf - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext
    - Dynamic flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding
    - IS-IS Sparse Link-State Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hsmit-lsr-isis-dnfm
    - OSPF Flooding Reduction - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction
    - Distributed Algorithm for Constrained IGP Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-allan-lsr-flooding-algorithm-00
    - IS-IS Support for Openfabric - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-openfabric/

  While there is much differentiation in these proposals there is also a significant amount of overlap. This is an area of WG debate and there may be in interim on the topic.

Since the last IETF in Montreal, there have not been in RFC published. However, the following drafts have have completed IESG review since Montreal and will be published "soon":

      - Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/
      - Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd/
      - OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id/
 
The following draft is currently in the IESG Evaluation process:

      - IS-IS Routing with Reverse Metric  - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric/

The following draft is in IETF last call:

        - OSPFv3 Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions/


Date: November 1st, 2018
       

     





2018-11-01 Acee Lindem
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state …
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state interior gateway routing protocols (IGPs) - specifically IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3. The LSR Working Group was formed by merging the isis and ospf WGs and assigning all their existing adopted work at the time of chartering to LSR.

Current areas of interest in the LSR WG include:

* Segment Routing Extensions: The IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3 extensions for the MPLS data plane are all nearly completion. The are all dependent on a normative reference to the "Segment Routing in the MPLS Data Plane" draft. Extensions for Segment Routing on the IPv6 data plane are under way. The salient LSR Segment Routing drafts are:

  - OSPF Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions/
  - IS-IS Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions/
  - OSPFv3 Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions/
  - Segment Routing in the MPLS Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls/
  - IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions/

* YANG Modeling: The base OSPF YANG Model has completed WG last call and is ready for publication request. The base IS-IS model will follow shortly. We have various model drafts for extensions that can be progressed now that the base models are nearly publication. The relevant YANG model drafts include:
   
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg/
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang/
    - YANG Model for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/

* Data Center (DC) Routing Optimizations: We have multiple proposals to reduce the flooding overhead in densely meshed data center topologies. Many of these will be presented at IETF 103 in Bangkok. A list of drafts in this area is included below:

    - IS-IS Spine Leaf - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext
    - Dynamic flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding
    - IS-IS Sparse Link-State Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hsmit-lsr-isis-dnfm
    - OSPF Flooding Reduction - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction
    - Distributed Algorithm for Constrained IGP Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-allan-lsr-flooding-algorithm-00
    - IS-IS Support for Openfabric - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-openfabric/

  While there is much differentiation in these proposals there is also a significant amount of overlap. This is an area of WG debate and there may be in interim on the topic.

Since the last IETF in Montreal, there have not been in RFC published. However, the following drafts have have completed IESG review since Montreal and will be published "soon":

      - Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/
      - Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd/
      - OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id/
 
The following draft is currently in the IESG Evaluation process:

      - IS-IS Routing with Reverse Metric  - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric/

The following draft is in IETF last call:

        - OSPFv3 Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions/
       

     





2018-11-01 Acee Lindem
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state …
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state interior gateway routing protocols (IGPs) - specifically IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3. The LSR Working Group was formed by merging the isis and ospf WGs and assigning all their existing adopted work at the time of chartering to LSR.

Current areas of interest in the LSR WG include:

* Segment Routing Extensions: The IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3 extensions for the MPLS data plane are all nearly completion. The are all dependent on a normative reference to the "Segment Routing in the MPLS Data Plane" draft. Extensions for Segment Routing on the IPv6 data plane are under way. The salient LSR Segment Routing drafts are:

  - OSPF Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions/
  - IS-IS Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions/
  - OSPFv3 Segment Routing Extensions - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions/
  - Segment Routing in the MPLS Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls/
  - IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Data Plane - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions/

* YANG Modeling: The base OSPF YANG Model has completed WG last call and is ready for publication request. The base IS-IS model will follow shortly. We have various model drafts for extensions that can be progressed now that the base models are nearly publication. The relevant YANG model drafts include:
   
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg/
    - YANG Data Model for OSPF Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang/
    - YANG Data Model for IS-IS Segment Routing - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang/
    - YANG Model for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/

* Data Center (DC) Routing Optimizations: We have multiple proposals to reduce the flooding overhead in densely meshed data center topologies. Many of these will be presented at IETF 103 in Bangkok. A list of drafts in this area is included below:

    - IS-IS Spine Leaf - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext
    - Dynamic flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding
    - IS-IS Sparse Link-State Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hsmit-lsr-isis-dnfm
    - OSPF Flooding Reduction - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction
    - Distributed Algorithm for Constrained IGP Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-allan-lsr-flooding-algorithm-00
    - IS-IS Support for Openfabric - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-openfabric/

  While there is much differentiation in these proposals there is also a significant amount of overlap. This is an area of WG debate and there may be in interim on the topic.




2018-11-01 Acee Lindem
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state …
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state interior gateway routing protocols (IGPs) - specifically IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3. The LSR Working Group was formed by merging the isis and ospf WGs and assigning all their existing adopted work at the time of chartering to LSR.

Current areas of interest in the LSR WG include:

* Data Center (DC) Routing Optimizations: We have multiple proposals to reduce the flooding overhead in densely meshed data center topologies. Many of these will be presented at IETF 103 in Bangkok. A list of drafts in this area is included below:

    - IS-IS Spine Leaf - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext
    - Dynamic flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding
    - IS-IS Sparse Link-State Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hsmit-lsr-isis-dnfm
    - OSPF Flooding Reduction - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction
    - Distributed Algorithm for Constrained IGP Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-allan-lsr-flooding-algorithm-00
    - IS-IS Support for Openfabric - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-openfabric/




2018-11-01 Acee Lindem
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state …
The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered to document current protocol implementation practices and improvements, protocol usage scenarios, maintenance and extensions of the link-state interior gateway routing protocols (IGPs) - specifically IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3. The LSR Working Group was formed by merging the isis and ospf WGs and assigning all their existing adopted work at the time of chartering to LSR.

Current areas of interest in the LSR WG include:

Data Center (DC) Routing Optimizations: We have multiple proposals to reduce the flooding overhead in densely meshed data center topologies. Many of these will be presented at IETF 103 in Bangkok. A list of drafts in this area is included below:

IS-IS Spine Leaf - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext
Dynamic flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding
IS-IS Sparse Link-State Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hsmit-lsr-isis-dnfm
OSPF Flooding Reduction - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction
Distributed Algorithm for Constrained IGP Flooding - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-allan-lsr-flooding-algorithm-00
IS-IS Support for Openfabric - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-openfabric/




2018-11-01 Acee Lindem
2018-10-19 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-103
2018-07-03 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-102
2018-04-22 Acee Lindem Secretaries changed to Yingzhen Qu from
2018-03-21 Amy K. Vezza Shepherding AD changed to Alvaro Retana from Alia Atlas
2018-02-27 Liz Flynn sent scheduled notification for IETF-101
2018-02-23 Cindy Morgan Added milestone "OSPFv3 Dual Stack (single instance)", due 2019-07-31, from approved charter
2018-02-23 Cindy Morgan Added milestone "IS-IS Segment Routing SR YANG Model", due 2019-03-31, from approved charter
2018-02-23 Cindy Morgan Added milestone "OSPF Segment Routing YANG Model", due 2019-03-31, from approved charter
2018-02-23 Cindy Morgan Added milestone "OSPFv2 Attribute Agility", due 2018-11-30, from approved charter
2018-02-23 Cindy Morgan Added milestone "OSPFv3 SR to IESG", due 2018-11-30, from approved charter
2018-02-23 Cindy Morgan Added milestone "IS-IS Segment Routing MSD to IESG", due 2018-07-31, from approved charter
2018-02-23 Cindy Morgan Added milestone "IS-IS Reverse Metric to IESG", due 2018-07-31, from approved charter
2018-02-23 Cindy Morgan Added milestone "ISIS YANG model to IESG", due 2018-07-31, from approved charter
2018-02-23 Cindy Morgan Added milestone "OSPF YANG Model to IESG", due 2018-07-31, from approved charter
2018-02-23 Cindy Morgan Charter approved, group active
2018-02-22 Alia Atlas Urls changed to https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/isis/documents/ (ISIS WG's Documents and RFCs), https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ospf/documents/ (OSPF WG's Documents and RFCs) from
2018-02-09 Cindy Morgan Mailing list archive changed to https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/ from
2018-02-09 Cindy Morgan Mailing list subscribe address changed to https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr from
2018-01-23 Alia Atlas Group created in state Proposed