IANA Considerations for IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Prefix Information Option Flags
RFC 8425
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Ignas Bagdonas Yes
Comment (2018-04-03 for -02)
No email
send info
send info
Ole's last name in text version seems to be incorrect, this is likely a UTF-8 conversion problem.
Spencer Dawkins Yes
Suresh Krishnan Yes
Warren Kumari Yes
Comment (2018-04-02 for -02)
No email
send info
send info
This document wins the "Best doc on the telechat" award :-)
Terry Manderson Yes
Alexey Melnikov Yes
Adam Roach Yes
Deborah Brungard No Objection
Ben Campbell No Objection
Comment (2018-04-03 for -02)
No email
send info
send info
Shouldn't this also update RFC 6275? Abstract: " ... is to request that IANA to create ..." : Too many "to"s.
Alissa Cooper No Objection
Comment (2018-04-03 for -02)
No email
send info
send info
I agree with the Gen-ART reviewer that RFC 6275 should be a normative reference. I don't think this document needs to update RFC 6275.
Benjamin Kaduk No Objection
Comment (2018-04-03 for -02)
No email
send info
send info
It would be good to see a response to the directorate reviews. Personally, I would lean towards also updating 6275, but defer to the responsible AD.
Mirja Kühlewind No Objection
Comment (2018-04-03 for -02)
No email
send info
send info
Was also wondering if this doc should also update RFC 6275. However, I didn't look at RFC 6275, so this is a question for the authors and responsible AD to decide.
Eric Rescorla No Objection
Alvaro Retana No Objection
Comment (2018-04-03 for -02)
No email
send info
send info
For completeness, a reference to rfc8126 would be nice.