Interworking between the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Presence
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
(Richard Barnes) Yes
(Gonzalo Camarillo) Yes
(Spencer Dawkins) Yes
(Pete Resnick) (was Discuss) Yes
This last version (and some conversation from the author) has answered my concerns with this document. Thanks.
(Sean Turner) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Benoît Claise) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
Comment (2014-02-06 for -07)
If the protocol between the gateways is not protected via (D)TLS, then doesn't this (and probabaly all other gateway functions) act in a potentially privacy unfriendly manner? I would have thought that worth noting at least, e.g. say that if (D)TLS is not used when gatewaying then the user has lost whatever security they used to have for their presence. (See also my comment on stox-core wrt turning on or requiring implementation of (D)TLS beteen gateways.) Sorry - forgot to note the change resulting from the secdir review  just in case it gets forgotten in a rush of some sort.  https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg04581.html