Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)
RFC 5953

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
14 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'This document describes a Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), that uses either ...
2015-10-14
14 (System) Notify list changed from isms-chairs@ietf.org, ietf@hardakers.net to (None)
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Pete Resnick
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Dan Romascanu
2011-06-06
14 Cindy Morgan State Changes to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Cindy Morgan
2011-05-27
14 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2011-05-26
2011-05-26
14 Cindy Morgan State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2011-05-26
14 (System) [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by IESG Secretary
2011-05-26
14 (System) [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by IESG Secretary
2011-05-26
14 (System) [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by IESG Secretary
2011-05-26
14 (System) [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by IESG Secretary
2011-05-26
14 (System) [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by IESG Secretary
2011-05-26
14 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Pete Resnick
2011-05-26
14 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Peter Saint-Andre
2011-05-26
14 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Amy Vezza
2011-05-26
14 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2011-05-26
14 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stephen Farrell
2011-05-26
14 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2011-05-25
14 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2011-05-25
14 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot comment]
2011-05-25
14 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
Much as I would love to believe that changing a bit of text in Section 7 solves the problem of moving SNMP-over-TLS from ...
2011-05-25
14 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
1) There are several normative references in this document to RFCs that are not ready to progress to Draft Standard. It's not ...
2011-05-25
14 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2011-05-25
14 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2011-05-25
14 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2011-05-25
14 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Stewart Bryant
2011-05-25
14 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to Undefined from No Objection by Stewart Bryant
2011-05-25
14 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2011-05-25
14 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Wesley Eddy
2011-05-24
14 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2011-05-24
14 Russ Housley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Russ Housley
2011-05-24
14 Cindy Morgan State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by Cindy Morgan
2011-05-24
14 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2011-05-23
14 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
I'd like to understand this bit of text in the interop report:

        Neither implementation claims to be a ...
2011-05-23
14 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
I'd like to understand this bit of text in the interop report:

        Neither implementation claims to be a ...
2011-05-23
14 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Pete Resnick
2011-05-19
14 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by David Harrington
2011-05-13
14 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2011-05-13
14 Amy Vezza Ballot has been issued by Amy Vezza
2011-05-13
14 Amy Vezza Created "Approve" ballot
2011-05-09
14 Sean Turner Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-05-26 by Sean Turner
2011-05-09
14 Sean Turner Status date has been changed to 2011-05-09 from 2011-04-19
2011-05-09
14 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Date: May 9, 2011 1:43:31 PM PDT
To:
IETF-Announce ...
2011-05-09
14 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Date: May 9, 2011 1:43:31 PM PDT
To: IETF-Announce ...
2011-05-09
14 Cindy Morgan State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2011-05-09
14 Sean Turner Last Call was requested by Sean Turner
2011-05-09
14 Sean Turner State Changes to Last Call Requested from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Sean Turner
2011-05-03
14 Cindy Morgan State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by Cindy Morgan
2011-04-19
14 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2011-04-19
14 Sean Turner Last Call was requested by Sean Turner
2011-04-19
14 Sean Turner State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Sean Turner
2011-04-19
14 Sean Turner State Changes to Publication Requested from Last Call Requested by Sean Turner
2011-04-19
14 Sean Turner Last Call was requested by Sean Turner
2011-04-19
14 Sean Turner State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Sean Turner
2011-04-19
14 Sean Turner Draft Added by Sean Turner in state Publication Requested
2010-08-20
14 Amy Vezza [Note]: changed to 'RFC 5953' by Amy Vezza
2010-08-20
14 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2010-08-20
14 (System) RFC published
2010-05-14
14 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2010-05-14
14 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2010-05-14
14 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2010-05-13
14 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2010-05-12
14 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-05-12
14 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-05-12
14 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-05-12
14 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2010-05-12
14 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-05-11
14 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
4.4.1.1 3rd para., "the tmSecurityName is presented to the TLS Transport Model by the application" is still inaccurate;

the new ...
2010-05-11
14 David Harrington [Ballot discuss]
2010-05-11
14 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to Yes from Discuss by David Harrington
2010-05-10
14 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot comment]
Cleared.
2010-05-10
14 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot discuss]
2010-05-10
14 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-05-10
14 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-05-10
14 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2010-05-07
14 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-14.txt
2010-05-07
13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-13.txt
2010-05-07
14 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-05-06
2010-05-06
14 David Harrington [Ballot comment]
2010-05-06
14 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
updated after reviewing -12-

4.1.1 I am concerned that "SHOULD map" is not specific enough; it does not recommend a 1 ...
2010-05-06
14 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-05-06
12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-12.txt
2010-05-06
14 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-05-06
14 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Alexey Melnikov
2010-05-06
14 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
I am still quite concerned about the following issues and I don't think I've heard convincing enough answers other than "this ...
2010-05-06
14 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot discuss]
2010-05-06
14 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-05-06
14 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-05-06
14 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
A few thoughts about the MIB module. Nothing of any great importance.

It would be helpful if the Imports clause indicated (through comments ...
2010-05-06
14 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-05-05
14 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
(new) 6. The MIB is included in the document to make it SNMP-manageable, but
> the problems can be experienced whether the device ...
2010-05-05
14 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
updated after reviewing -11-

4.1.1 "Enterprise configurations are encouraged to map" -
> the change in -11- to "Deployments SHOULD" addresses this ...
2010-05-05
14 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This is an updated discuss - adding a new second issue.

(1) RFC 5590 states:

  It is considered desirable by some industry segments ...
2010-05-05
14 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot comment]
2010-05-05
14 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
I agree that this document is important, however there is a list of issues I would like to discuss before recommending approval of ...
2010-05-05
14 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
2010-05-05
14 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
RFC 5590 states:

  It is considered desirable by some industry segments that SNMP
  Transport Models utilize transport-layer security that addresses
  ...
2010-05-05
14 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-05-05
14 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
RFC 5590 states:

  It is considered desirable by some industry segments that SNMP
  Transport Models utilize transport-layer security that addresses
  ...
2010-05-04
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-11.txt
2010-05-04
14 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
Section 1.1 has:

  "Authentication" in this document typically refers to the English
  meaning of "serving to prove the authenticity of ...
2010-05-04
14 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
The definition of snmpTlstmCertSANIpAddress mentions that securityName lengths might exceed what VACM can handle; doesn't this introduce possible interoperability problems?

The definition ...
2010-05-04
14 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-05-04
14 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
Section 1.1 has:

  "Authentication" in this document typically refers to the English
  meaning of "serving to prove the authenticity of ...
2010-05-04
14 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-05-04
14 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-05-01
14 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
[RFC5292]  Chen, E. and S. Sangli, "Address-Prefix-Based Outbound
              Route Filter for BGP-4", RFC 5292, August ...
2010-05-01
14 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
I agree that this document is important, however there is a list of issues I would like to discuss before recommending approval of ...
2010-05-01
14 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In Section 3.1.2, the last sentence of the last paragraph:

  Implementations should offer

s/should/SHOULD ?

  configuration settings for ...
2010-05-01
14 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
I agree that this document is important, however there is a list of issues I would like to discuss before recommending approval of ...
2010-05-01
14 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In Section 3.1.2, the last sentence of the last paragraph:

  Implementations should offer

s/should/SHOULD ?

  configuration settings for ...
2010-05-01
14 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
I agree that this document is important, however there is a list of issues I would like to discuss before recommending approval of ...
2010-05-01
14 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In Section 3.1.2, the last sentence of the last paragraph:

  Implementations should offer

s/should/SHOULD ?

  configuration settings for ...
2010-05-01
14 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
I agree that this document is important, however there is a list of issues I would like to discuss before recommending approval of ...
2010-05-01
14 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-04-29
14 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. For consistency purposes (as TLS is expanded) expand SNMP in the title.

2. In a couple of places (section 1, section 9 ...
2010-04-29
14 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
This is a very important and well written document, and before baloting a YES vote I would like to clarify a few issues ...
2010-04-29
14 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-04-27
14 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
section 1: s/standard defined/specification/

section 3: ist paragraph, second sentence - I had trouble parsing this. You seem to have a message ...
2010-04-27
14 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
3.1.1, 4. Per RFC3365 (BCP61),
  However security must be a MUST IMPLEMENT so that end users will have
  the ...
2010-04-27
14 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by David Harrington
2010-04-15
14 Sean Turner Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-05-06 by Sean Turner
2010-04-15
14 Sean Turner State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Sean Turner
2010-04-15
14 Sean Turner [Note]: 'Juergen Schoenwaelder (j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de) is the document shepherd.' added by Sean Turner
2010-04-15
14 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2010-04-15
14 Sean Turner Ballot has been issued by Sean Turner
2010-04-15
14 Sean Turner Created "Approve" ballot
2010-04-14
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-10.txt
2010-04-06
14 Amanda Baber
IANA comments:

Action #1:

Upon approval of this document, IANA will assign the following mib-2
number at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers

Decimal Name ...
2010-03-31
14 Sean Turner Responsible AD has been changed to Sean Turner from Pasi Eronen
2010-03-22
14 Pasi Eronen The IETF Last Call really lasts until 2010-04-02.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg07156.html
2010-03-22
14 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-03-15
14 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Dave Cridland
2010-03-08
14 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-03-08
14 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-03-08
14 Amy Vezza Last Call was requested by Amy Vezza
2010-03-08
14 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-03-08
14 (System) Last call text was added
2010-03-08
14 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-03-08
14 Amy Vezza State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2010-03-06
14 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-03-06
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-09.txt
2010-02-25
14 Pasi Eronen State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Pasi Eronen
2010-02-22
14 Pasi Eronen State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Pasi Eronen
2010-02-22
14 Pasi Eronen [Note]: 'Juergen Schoenwaelder (j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de) is the document shepherd.' added by Pasi Eronen
2010-02-08
14 Amy Vezza
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular, does ...
2010-02-08
14 Amy Vezza Draft Added by Amy Vezza in state Publication Requested
2010-02-08
14 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'Juergen Schoenwaelder (j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de) is the document shepherd.' added by Amy Vezza
2010-02-02
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-08.txt
2010-01-28
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-07.txt
2010-01-27
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-06.txt
2010-01-08
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-05.txt
2009-12-30
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-04.txt
2009-12-23
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-03.txt
2009-12-08
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-02.txt
2009-10-23
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-01.txt
2009-09-02
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-00.txt