Alternative Certificate Formats for the Public-Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX) Certificate Management Protocols
RFC 4212

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Russ Housley) Yes

(Steven Bellovin) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

Comment (2004-04-02)
No email
send info
The security considerations section is inadequate.  The phrase "this entire memo is about security" should be banned...  Does use of this format introduce any new risks?  Quite possibly -- the situation seems analogous to downgrade attacks.  Are there other risks?

(Margaret Cullen) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Scott Hollenbeck) No Objection

Comment (2004-03-17 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
I really think the Security Considerations section of this document could be better written to address the topics described in RFC 3552/BCP 72, even if only to say that there are no issues with authentication, authorization, privacy, etc.

(Bert Wijnen) No Record

Comment (2004-04-02 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Violates the use of fqdns

    "Alice <>"

Should probably be ??

There are multiple of those