% Datatracker information for RFCs on the Legacy Stream is unfortunately often % incorrect. Please correct the bibtex below based on the information in the % actual RFC at https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1030.txt @misc{rfc1030, series = {Request for Comments}, number = 1030, howpublished = {RFC 1030}, publisher = {RFC Editor}, doi = {10.17487/RFC1030}, url = {https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1030}, author = {}, title = {{On testing the NETBLT Protocol over divers networks}}, pagetotal = 16, year = 1987, month = nov, abstract = {This memo describes the results gathered from testing NETBLT over three networks of different bandwidths and round-trip delays. The results are not complete, but the information gathered so far has not been promising. The NETBLT protocol is specified in RFC-998; this document assumes an understanding of the specification as described in RFC-998.}, }