Telechat Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09
review-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09-genart-telechat-sparks-2018-05-01-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics
Requested rev. no specific revision
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-05-22
Requested 2018-04-09
Other Reviews Genart Last Call review of -08 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Brian Weis (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Robert Sparks
Review review-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09-genart-telechat-sparks-2018-05-01
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/3w4Yy5ckiNgtSDB9Qv1ZDxpnciQ
Reviewed rev. 09
Review result Ready with Nits
Draft last updated 2018-05-01
Review completed: 2018-05-01

Review
review-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09-genart-telechat-sparks-2018-05-01

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2018-05-01
IETF LC End Date: 2018-02-23
IESG Telechat date: 2018-05-24

Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC, but with nits to consider before publication

Note that this is identical to my last call review, which I don't think I've seen a response to.

The document argues to include things in the W3C statistics API in the last paragraph of 5.2.2.
Section 7 seems to say those have been included already. 
It would be good to rework both of these mentions to reflect what's true at the time of the publication of the RFC, in a way that the text will make sense when read years from now.