Telechat Review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06

Request Review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm
Requested rev. no specific revision
Type Telechat Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2018-03-06
Requested 2018-02-07
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Other Reviews Genart Last Call review of -06 by Francis Dupont
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Daniel Migault
Review State Completed
Reviewer IJsbrand Wijnands
Review review-ietf-sidr-slurm-06-rtgdir-telechat-wijnands-2018-02-27
Posted at
Reviewed rev. 06
Review result Has Nits
Draft last updated 2018-02-27
Review completed: 2018-02-27



I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06 
Reviewer: IJsbrand Wijnands 
Review Date: 27-02-2018 
Intended Status: Standards Track


• This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be considered prior to publication.


This document reads ok.

Minor issues:

It seems to me it would be useful to have a "Terminology and Definitions” section where the various acronyms are defined. That would help readers who are less familiar in this area (like myself) to parse the document.


1. Introduction

* What is a "putative TAs”? Its not declared anywhere.

* What is a “ROAs”? Should there be a RFC reference here?

2. RPKI RPs with SLURM

* What are “RPs”? Its not declared anywhere. 

3.3.  SLURM Target

* "A SLURM filer”, is that a filter or file?