Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ice-trickle-16
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.
The summary of the review is: ready with nits.
(nit) Section 2: What is a "ufrag pair"? Is it short for username
fragment pair? I might have just missed it, but I don't see a definition
in the referenced terminology.
(nit) Section 15: If I understand correctly, the signaling protocol also
needs to guarantee that the end-of-candidates indication is not
re-ordered with respect to any trickled candidates. Is that correct? Is
it worth adding to the requirements?
Freelance cyber security consultant, software developer, and more