Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-18
review-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-18-genart-lc-robles-2018-11-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 21)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-11-06
Requested 2018-10-23
Other Reviews
Review State Completed
Reviewer Ines Robles
Review review-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-18-genart-lc-robles-2018-11-03
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/75meZaeb00BX_oGOPlLpA7wZF_0
Reviewed rev. 18 (document currently at 21)
Review result Almost Ready
Draft last updated 2018-11-03
Review completed: 2018-11-03

Review
review-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-18-genart-lc-robles-2018-11-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-18
Reviewer: Ines Robles	
Review Date: 11-03-2018
IETF LC End Date: 11-06-2018
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:

I believe the draft is technically good. This document is well written and clear to understand.

This document describes the Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) protocol, which provides an authenticated "chain of custody" for a message, allowing each entity that handles the message to see what entities handled it before, and to see what the message's authentication assessment was at each step in the handling.

I like that the document mentions the available implementations.

Major issues: Not found

Minor issues:

There is a TODO in Appendix B, so I suppose further information will be added to the draft later.

Nits/editorial comments: 

Page 18: “ptypes” →types
Page 22: “concocted” → connected? 

Thank you for this draft.

Ines