Last Call Review of draft-ietf-clue-signaling-13
review-ietf-clue-signaling-13-secdir-lc-lonvick-2018-10-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-clue-signaling
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-10-17
Requested 2018-10-03
Other Reviews Genart Last Call review of -13 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by √Čric Vyncke (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -14 by Robert Sparks
Review State Completed
Reviewer Chris Lonvick
Review review-ietf-clue-signaling-13-secdir-lc-lonvick-2018-10-11
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/820oqcsvVu3jNDxykRVkQj4x_W4
Reviewed rev. 13 (document currently at 14)
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2018-10-11
Review completed: 2018-10-11

Review
review-ietf-clue-signaling-13-secdir-lc-lonvick-2018-10-11

Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. 
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security 
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these 
comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is READY. The Security Considerations section 
is appropriate for the document.

It looks like all of the CLUE documents may become RFCs at, or near the 
same time. If that is the case, the authors and shepherd may want to 
include a common statement that implementers should read the security 
considerations sections of each of the other associated documents.

Regards,
Chris