Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-05
review-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-05-genart-telechat-sparks-2015-11-20-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-09-15
Requested 2015-09-11
Draft last updated 2015-11-20
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Robert Sparks
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Paul Wouters (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Robert Sparks
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-05-genart-telechat-sparks-2015-11-20
Reviewed rev. 05
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2015-11-20

Review
review-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-05-genart-telechat-sparks-2015-11-20

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 14 Sep 2015
IETF LC End Date: past
IESG Telechat date: 17 Sep 2015

Summary: (still) Ready for publication as Proposed Standard

Thanks for the improvements in -05.

On 9/2/15 3:04 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:



I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-04
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2 Sep 2015
IETF LC End Date: 9 Sep 2015
IESG Telechat date: Not yet scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard



One thing I'd like to check, and I suspect this pokes at a 


conversation that has already happened (as hinted in the 


acknowledgements section):






The discussion of managements systems having to deal with a 64 bit 


wavelength label caught my eye. This is an RFC3471 section 3.2.1.1 


label isn't it? That document shows wavelength labels as 32 bit 


things. Has something updated 3471 to say to expect a multiple of 32 


bits, and not 32 bits specifically? If not, maybe this document would 


be a good place to do so explicitly, rather than what appears to be 


fiat at the moment?






micro-nit: at the end of the introduction "in that regard" suggests 


the document updates the work of the ITU-T in some other regard? I 


suggest simple deleting the phrase.